system.Unlike the system on the F90 BMW M5, there is no rear-wheel drive only option.
Even if you are not a car enthusiast, you can easily point out a BMW vehicle on the street.
Others on the other hand, are more receptive towards the idea. Are tiny turbo engines good or bad?
Hydrogen-powered BMW NEXT Concept picturedThe journey towards sustainability has never been easy.
** This article is the personal experience of a 1997 BMW E38 728i owner and does not necessarily reflect
BMW announced last year they will be discontinuing their hybrid supercar, the BMW i8.
As you know, BMW has officially discontinued the BMW i8.
i8’s looks appeal both men and women, when in motion, the i8 is a sleek hybrid machine with the
comfort and agile handling, something which is lost on the newer G20.Although the latest G20 handles
BMW is rolling not just a new design for its signature kidney grille, but also a new logo.The current
the BMW Hydrogen 7, which was based on the E65 BMW 7 Series.
3-cylinder engines are on the bottom-rung.Yet, they seem to be on the rise with both the Proton X50
It’s small wonder they have been catching on, and the Mercedes-Benz GLA 250 is certainly capitalizing
, but they can also place an online booking for the cars available on the online store.Stand a chance
Its goal is to take on BMW.A Mazda competing with BMW? What blasphemy is this?
They are anything but practical.BMW i8 concept (top) and production (bottom)Design ideas like the translucent
BMW recently released a new video showcasing the recently-updated BMW 5 Series running wireless Android
Bitter, but model cutting is an obligatory course for BMW to go through this gloomy course.Majority of
Back in 2014, the BMW Laserlight made its premiere in the BMW i8 and has now made its way into several
, the BMW M340i xDrive.
A problem we have with the G20 BMW 3 Series is that the Digital Key feature is only available for Android
Now the BMW 8 Series is even more powerful!
job is done, whatever it may be, the tyre shop will try to upsell you nitrogen gas inflation for your
A total of 60 participants in 30 cars, comprising of the 2019 Proton Iriz, Persona and Saga set off on
The BMW Group and Mercedes-Benz AG are putting their cooperation on development of next-generation technology
peak of BMW’s executive sedan in its M Sport trim.Courtesy of Autohome, we now have a good look
The criteria for the car are as follows: Good fuel consumption Minimal on the maintenance cost Sporty
of Samling Group around rough roads to carry out work for their gas pipeline industry.Site Manager Mr
It looks like Kia has been busy recruiting some of the best talents from BMW.
is the bmw i8 good on gas-is the bmw i8 good on gas-2014 BMW i8 FIRST DRIVE & REVIEW!
is the bmw i8 good on gas-is the bmw i8 good on gas-BMW i8 Vs Bmw M2 Comparison - Which is Better?
is the bmw i8 good on gas-is the bmw i8 good on gas-BMW i8
is the bmw i8 good on gas-PICKING UP A 2014 BMW i8!!
is the bmw i8 good on gas-[HOT] 2018 BMW i3s, Its More Powerfull Than The 'M' ?
is the bmw i8 good on gas-BMW i8 vs BENTLEY GT3-R: PUBLIC REACTION w/ SHMEE150
is the bmw i8 good on gas-BMW i8 Start Up, Test Drive, and In Depth Review
is the bmw i8 good on gas-2020 BMW i8 Review, Pricing, and Specs
is the bmw i8 good on gas-BMW i8
is the bmw i8 good on gas-I8 GETS NEW MODS! (NEW M CAR REVEAL!)
Kinda? But the military dollars spent is still a fraction of the trillions it would cost for M4A. You wanna go buy a new BMW I8 with me? It’s a really good car I don’t care how much it costs...it’ll save on gas mileage?
@tavo10_17 Or get a sports car that is good on gas like the BMW i8!
Honestly bro thanks for loaning me that 10k the other day. You’re real as fuck for letting me stay in your guest house too. Hope your 2020 Bmw i8 is good on gas? I filled it up before I returned it to you.
I’m going to say no. I do think the car looks good if you can get by the Frito Bandito mustache on the front, but my primary issue is it isn’t much of an electric car with 32 mi range in battery-only mode. Like the BMW i8 (15 mi battery-only), it doesn’t do much to get us off gasoline. You still have to go to the gas station (I haven’t been for 4 years and don’t miss it). As for roominess, the Fisker is a lot more cramped than the Tesla Model S (which can optionally seat 5 adults and 2 children under 8) and isn’t as practical (the Tesla rear seats fold down and you can carry a 65″ TV in the box and you have a front trunk too). More EVs are good, but compromise cars are almost never as good as just a pure EV or pure gasoline vehicle on its own.
This is a joke that started a while back with a compilation video of Mustangs spinning out while leaving car meets. It happens with other cars too, but Mustangs tend to get a bad rep for it for a number of reasons. One is the meme, but another is that they’re a very popular but not very expensive performance car, which means a lot of Mustang owners aren’t very experienced and don’t know how to handle the car very well. Any fast rear-wheel-drive car will oversteer (lose traction in the rear and rotate too far into the turn) if you give it too much gas suddenly while turning, but a properly trained driver will be able to steer into the slide and recover. Many drivers of cheap fast cars, including Mustangs, don’t have the training or experience to do this properly. As a result, what they imagine in their heads as a spectacular powerslide ends up with the car spinning out of control and hitting a crowd, another car or a tree. This is what they’re hoping for: (I couldn’t find a good powerslide gif of a Mustang, so please enjoy this BMW i8.) This is what ends up happening: . Moral of the story: know your limits, pay attention to your surroundings, don’t try to show off if you don’t know what you’re doing, and when leaving car shows, just drive out of the parking lot like a normal person instead of doing something idiotic.
The i8 really isn’t that powerful a car, the little 3-cylinder only produces around 200 horsepower which is a far cry from supercar territory, you only get its best when it’s tiny battery is charged which won’t last you very long since it’s less than 1/10th the size of the battery a Tesla has. It’s 0–60 is significantly slower than a P100D (or even something plain like a 75D) and the range is roughly the same. It also of course misses out on being a practical daily car which is something the Model S does very well. The sole thing the i8 has going for it is looks, and it’s very much a bark-worse-than-its-bite situation. The engine is so puny that the car pipes fake V8 noise in through the speakers. It’s a hybrid that wants to be both an EV and a gas-burning supercar but isn’t doing a good job of being either.
The main reasons that consumers reject electric cars, in no particular order: They have concerns and reservations about electric car technology They see electric cars as changing so fast that buying now would be investing in obsolescence They have issues with range limitations They have issues with reliable charging They have ample, reasonable alternatives to electric vehicles Here's more detail on each of the above. Concerns and reservations about electric car technology, go a long ways towards explaining the immediate hesitancy that many consumers have towards buying an electric car. In many people's minds, electric cars are brand new technology that is still somewhat unproven. It will take years for these people to see electric cars as a legitimate transportation option. These are so-called "slow adopters" who always take time to embrace new technology. There are also people who have concerns about battery longevity (likely overblown), people who have concerns about vehicle reliability (perhaps not overblown, as Tesla's Model S has experienced numerous high profile problems), and people who just don't quite "get" electric cars. Of all the reasons I've listed, concerns and reservations about technology are the least important. It's merely a matter of time until all these concerns go away. Still, these concerns are making many consumers hesitate as of 2015. The opposite of the "I'm scared of new technology" objection is the ,"I'm waiting for the better electric car technology right around the corner," objection. Most new car buyers keep their vehicles for 4-6 years, which means that whatever they buy today will take them out of the market until 2020 or so. Do ,you, want to be the person who drops $30k on a new Leaf only to find that you can have a Tesla Model III in 2018 for only a few dollars more? No you don't. Hence, you skip the Leaf for now and wait to see what Tesla does. Tesla is at least partially to blame here, as they've promised the moon to plug-in vehicle enthusiasts. Until the Model III actually hits the ground (sometime in 2019 is my guess) many of the people willing to invest big money into electric cars are probably going to wait to buy a plugin EV. Issues with range limitations, reveal an odd little quirk of the new car buying process that most people don't understand. Having sold cars (or managed the sale of cars) for nearly a decade, I can say unequivocally that ,consumers often buy vehicles for exceptional needs,. I can't tell you the number of times I've seen people invest in a big SUV or a massive pickup truck just so they'd have a vehicle they could use to ferry the inlaws around or haul the boat literally 2 times a year. It would be more rational for consumers to rent a van when the inlaws visit, borrow a truck when they need to haul the boat, etc., but that's not how we do things in the United States. Which brings us to the range limitation of plugin EVs: most car owners make annual road trips to visit family for the holidays (see ,http://newsroom.aaa.com/2014/12/aaa-98-6-million-americans-traveling-holiday-season-four-percent-last-year/, for some stats). Are all these holiday road trippers going to: a) drive the Leaf 80 miles, wait an hour at a fast charger, etc. or b) rent a gas powered car to make the annual trip to grandma's or c) just buy a car that can make the trip in the first place? Pretty sure I know the answer to that question, how about you?* *HINT: 99.7% of new vehicle buyers purchased gas or diesel powered vehicles in 2014. But even if new plugin technology can conquer range limitations and technological anxieties of one form or another, we still have a lack of ,reliable charging options., Indeed, a lack of reliable electrical access is the achilles heel of electric cars. Only ,35%, of US households are single family homes (,https://nmhc.org/Content.aspx?id=4708,). The majority of households are apartment buildings and/or multi-family homes, and guess what's hard to do when you live in an apartment or multi-family building? Plug in your car overnight. Is it impossible for apartment dwellers to plug in their electric cars? Not at all. But it's not convenient currently for the vast majority of people who don't live in single family homes. Hence, t,he majority of consumers won't be inclined to buy electric cars until there are ample public charging systems for daily use,, and that's not happening anytime soon as far as I can tell. Consumer Reports, ran a little ,phone survey, and found that only 50% of those surveyed could plugin their car reliably...and that's using a standard 110AC outlet, not a 240V outlet typically recommended for electric car owners. It's also not clear if the plugin consumers mentioned would have to be shared by other people living in the same building. Access to nightly charging is all but required for plugin EV ownership, and half of consumers don't have it. That's a pretty big deal. Finally, we come to the fact that there are ,a bevy of reasonable gas and diesel powered alternatives to plugin EVs,. A middle of the line Nissan Leaf SV is a $32,000 car ($25k after federal tax rebate) that: Only drives about 80 miles before you have to plug it in, compared to a 300 mile range for any gas powered car (which can extend range 300 miles more after a 3 minute fueling). Doesn't offer the visibility or AWD capability of the similarly sized and slightly lower priced Nissan Juke. Costs ~$9,000 more than the similarly sized Nissan Versa (built on the exact same platform as the Juke and the Leaf). Isn't holding it's resale value nearly as well as the Versa or the Juke (or any other gas powered car) - see ,Resale Prices Tumble on Electric Cars Is the Leaf cheaper than the Juke or the Versa? Perhaps, after 5-10 years of operation, the Leaf is cheaper (it will depend on gas prices, reliability, etc.) But consumers typically don't buy products based on all the money they can save 10 years from now. In my experience, buying a new car isn't a math problem for most consumers. If it turns out that vehicle X is a little more money in the long run than vehicle Y, so what. It's going to come down to an emotional preference. I'd like to point out that ,Michael Barnard, - who is a perfectly reasonable person, I must add - offers up a misleading answer to this question that ignores consumer behaviors regarding expense management (consumers usually choose to pay less now and more later), conflates electric motorcycle performance with larger EV performance, and argues that the $75k+ Model S is a good looking road trip car while simultaneously arguing EVs are affordable by talking about the Leaf. And even he admits that we're still "a few years" away from a day when consumers will be able to buy an EV without raising an objection. Summing up, ,plugin electric cars don't sell very well because they're not a great option for the average consumer,. They're not a bad option, per se, they're just not great. Kind of like using public transportation, commuting to work by bicycle, or carpooling...all things "rational" consumers should do, but choose not to. Do I see a future for plugin EVs? Absolutely. The Model S has proven that plugin EVs are excellent platforms for luxurious, high performance vehicles. Indeed, BMW's i8, the Porsche 918, the next-gen Acura NSX, LaFerrari, etc. are all flashing red indicators of the future of the supercar market. It's hard to imagine that anyone will be selling an exclusively gas powered luxury car in 10 years, not with the performance capabilities of a vehicle driven by an electric motor with infinite torque. Likewise, the market for luxurious plugin electric commuter cars (like the BMW i3) - or even moderately equipped plugin electric commuter cars (like the Leaf and Volt) - will continue to grow as battery technology improves. There are consumers (and fleets) who buy cars based purely on dollars and cents, and these consumers will switch to EVs when it's financially prudent to do so (which should happen sometime in the next decade or so). But until: the majority of vehicle owners have reliable access to an electrical outlet every night and public fast charging systems are convenient and pervasive plugin EVs will be a niche vehicle that will struggle to capture more than a slice of the US automotive market. BTW, for anyone who wants to comment and call me an "EV hater," the US energy information agency projects plugin EVs will account for only 2% of the vehicle market by 2040. See ,Annual Energy Outlook 2014 Early Release,. I'm not saying anything that the experts on such matters haven't already said.
Model S Full Electric - None yet. Porsche Mission E suppose to come by 2020 Mercedes announce they will make their all EV car w/ new brand. Haven’t reveal what it is yet. PHEV - Mercedes S550 PHEV. all ev range around 30km, next year face lift should provide up to 50km EV range. far better interior than model S. Engine is whisper quiet Porsche Panamera e-Hybird. All Ev range around 51km. Model just updated. Seriously good engine and nicer design. BMW i8 - EV range around 20–30km. Expect more after facelift next year. this car looks like it came from the future!! Saw one of them in the street of istanbul, looks like it is from the future. Design is good for the next 30–40 years. the 3-cylinder engine sounds a lot better than a lot V8s and straight 6s. Model X Full Electric - None yet PHEV - BMW X5 eDrive - around 30km EV range. nice engine. they should put more batteries on the floor plan but i guess they don’t want to make it too heavy. Model 3 A lot more contenders here as the price range is affordable to the top 10%. Plus consider alternatives as the model 3 will take quite to acquire. Full electric - Chevy Bolt. 300+ km range. The tesla looks nicer. But at least this one available today instead of 2020+ BMW i3 - they just updated the batter to be 50% more than last year model. news from the grapevine says that next year facelift will have even more battery power which provides range upto 400km+. The design is a bit strange, but it really showcase BMW automotive technology prowess. I think the used market is around $20–25k in the USA today Mercedes B-class. no fast charging option. Volkswagen e-Golf: around 130–160km range. built from their golf-platform. they also announce that their will produce a new EV from the ground up (looks like from golf) by 2020 w/ range upto 300–400km range. The design will certainly change from the concept (pictured), but overall, looks gorgeous. PHEV BMW 330e - around 30–40km EV range. sporty drive Mercedes 300e - around 30–40km EV range. really nice and classy interior. Supercharger Going cross-country / out of comfort zone. it is good to know that you can re-charge your car when you decided to go for a road trip ChargePoint - over 60k stations (including tesla supercharger network) in the USA. Plugshare - It’s a map of charging stations around the world. It shows that Japan has a lot of charging stations. In fact more than gas stations. which is impressive. Overview I like Tesla as a car company, their car design is great. I love their attention to detail that is given to their cars especially the model S. That being said, I wish that they would up the interior to compete on level of luxury. Especially when you are paying over 100 grand for a car, you expect the car would be a little more luxurious. It’s great to have a car company that is changing the conversation on the drive train + fuel source of a car. Tesla won’t be going to be the giant car company like GM in the next 10 years of so, but it’s a pleasure the see that traditional car companies are changing direction from fossil-fuel powered to renewable energy powered car in the future.
Oh yeah for sure. I think a good example of that would be the bmw i8. Its not nearly as fast as a lambo, but 0-60 in 4 seconds will still make you fly back in your seat. Although most luxury cars dont need good fuel economy. Manufactures love to put big v8 and big v12s in their cars which is what we want when buying a 100,000+ car. The cars sound great and are generally very quick. If you can afford that car you will have no problem buying gas for it.
Maybe, hard to say. There are a lof answers here tackling the question from the saving side. Let’s look at what it take to buy and maintain an i8—let’s assume afford means not just purchase but keep it running. What will it cost to purchase an i8 twenty years from now? Could it become a collectible? I think there’s a strong case for and against. It has a few things going for it. First its rare. This is Econ 101. Since its introduction in 2014 up to the first three months of there have been just about 4500 i8s sold in the US. Compare that to the current generation Corvette, also introduced in 2014 which has sold about 100,000 units and is going strong and will for another 5 years or so until the next generation. The 911 sells about 30% as much as the Corvette. In twenty years its unlikely most Corvettes or 911s will be collectible. Say, $15k to $25k gets a decent one. 2017 i8 sales are slow with about 50 per month. I don’t know if there is some issue with deliveries but if not it looks like the i8 is really slowing down and most of the people who wanted one already got one. BMW’s Z3M coupe is a great recent example of that phenomenon. Just a few thousand made and now very collectible. Second, the i8 is for some young people a “poster car”. Twenty years from now, some of today’s 18 year olds will have some money to buy the cars they dreamed about when they were younger. Those two things—rarity and desirability among young people when new—are really critical. Also going for the i8 is that it was one of the first of its kind—the hybrid gas/electric sports car. Three other contemporary cars fit that description—LaFerrari, McLaren P1, Porsche 918—and those are all instant collectibles while the i8 cost about 1/7. Some cars like the BMW Z8 became instant collectibles. Prices never fell. That’s not the case with the i8. Low milage 2014s are selling for under $85k, so these have lost more than a 1/3 of their value in 3 years—standard luxury car depreciation. That would indicate prices are likely to fall a lot further before they go back up, if ever. The i8 also faces a number of other headwinds in terms of collectibility: it is complex which means it could be expensive to maintain, parts difficult to source and possibly hard to find mechanics who know how to service them. Presumably BMW is in business in 20 years and they will continue to support the i8 as a matter of pride and good customer support, but remember that BMW dealer service stands for Bring Money in your Wallet. The macchiato machine in the waiting room doesn’t pay for itself. No matter how much prices of the i8 fall, the cost of parts is always indexed against its $144 original price. This goes to the affordability, not just purchase part of the question. You could face several thousand dollars per year on average in maintenance and repairs and if you have a major component failure it could be tens of thousands. Insurance will not be cheap either because if it gets damaged, remember that $144k MSRP. If you plan to drive it a lot, more milage hurts collectibility and the value. Another issue for the i8—its just not that fast. While it has technologies vaguely like a McLaren P1 it can’t hang with one in terms of performance. For that matter it can’t with a Corvette, a base 911, Audi R8. And that’s not even getting into Mustangs and Camaros which are now supercar fast. Honda/Acura did make a hybrid, the NSX that’s among the fastest cars and sells for around the same price as an i8. (It is puzzling that BMW chose to use a 3 cylinder engine from a MINI Cooper. Why not its iconic straight 6 and make the sucker fast? Why didn’t the make the i3 have range like a Tesla? I digress.) The next i8 is rumored to be fast and if that launches a line of cars that lasts twenty years, that will help resale as the i8 will be first of its series and not a one-off. Right now, the i8 is depreciating at the rate of a big luxury sedan. In twenty years a BMW 7-series will be worth $5k. An iconic sportscar will never go that low. There are too many BMW fans with garages full of M cars, Z3s, etc to let prices fall that much. And then there are kids seeing them today who say to themselves I have to have one one day. This was a long way of saying, the in twenty years i8 will probably cost a lot less than its sticker price of $144k and probably less than its price today $85k, but probably closer to that than $0. I count three “probablys” in that last sentence.
Well, it depends. I would love to have this 3 cylinder under my bonnet, any time: Nissan build this 80 pound beast 1.5l displacement engine for LeMans, it delivers 400hp! A three cylinder will not be the most smooth running engine you ever bought, they tend to run a bit rougher than 4 cylinders. The have a bit less internal friction (one less set of pistons, one less set of valves with all touching/moving surfaces and less bearings. ,They are lighter, a lot. and smaller., So if you intend to run your car downtown, or lots of stop and go, this is your engine, cheaper, lighter, better gas mileage and the rough running will not bother you. I heard (see comments) the BMW 3 cylinder even runs smoother than the 4 cylinder, in a BMW 3 series (or mini) and saves 130kg or so. It seems a lot of fun, but the 4 cylinders have more power and torque, of course. If you run a lot on motorways, you will probably be better off with a 4 cylinder. It runs usually smoother (but 3 cylinders can be tamed with balances), the extra weight will mot make much difference and the gas mileage is likely the same, or even better if you push your engine hard. My dad has a Skoda with 3 cylinders, first you notice the rough running, after a while it gets normal, a bit raunchy. It is a great little runner, but do not expect to hunt BMW down the Autobahn, not even the three cylinder versions! Far away from the Skoda is the BMW i8, that also runs on a high tech 3 cylinder, and squeezes 231hp out of the 1.5l turbo. This is 154hp per liter displacement motorcycle territory (well they can get this without turbos, but are not as robust). So here the main reason will have been weight and size; the car running on ICE alone has not a very low fuel mileage, but with the batteries and EV carries a lot of weight, so it is still pretty good, and the 3cylinder help to save weight and space to get a sexy car with very good combined gas mileage.
I have owned a BMW i8 since October 2014 and have also driven a Tesla. People seem to like to compare the two because they are both trendy and green, but in my mind they are very different animals. Tesla, 1. All electric and therefore greener (ignoring battery recycling issues) 2. Large battery (now about 300 miles of range) 3. Range anxiety - even when commuting or making short trips, if you forgot to charge over night, you could be in trouble, making you have to wait to leave your house until you plug in and feel you have enough charge. You might very well be at work and think "I can't run the errand I want to because I have to get home and charge". Granted some planning can help prevent this, but it's a real issue. On longer trips, you have to plan your route to hit locations where you can charge your car. 4. Looks - great looking car, though still mainly a typical sedan shape 5. Performance - I won't go into all of the specs, but the 0-60 of the Tesla is great and on the order of 3.0 seconds with the top version of the car, making it the fastest sedan Motor Trend has tested to date. 6. Cargo capacity - standard cargo space 7. Wow factor - people are now more used to the car, so you can go about your business without too much hassle. BMW i8, 1. Hybrid 3 cylinder gas engine and electric motor with small battery and therefore less green than the Tesla. 2. Small battery (about 25 miles of range on the battery alone, but well over 300 miles of range when combined with the gas range) 3. No range anxiety - just like any other car, go anywhere and fill it up with gas when you need it (a small tank at about 11 gallons capacity) and off you go. 4. Looks - amazing looking car, with the looks of a top exotic (though I still don't know if I like the scissor doors or not) 5. Performance - The 0-60 of the i8 is good, but not great, and is somewhere in the 4.0-4.5 second range. 6. Cargo capacity - very little 7. Wow factor - if you want to make people ooh and aah, this is the car for you. Personally, I don't like that aspect of the i8, but it is what it is. Be prepared to have complete strangers ask to take pictures of your car, pull up dangerously beside you to take pictures, etc. I kid you not, yesterday a woman flashed me because I was driving the i8! To be honest, either car would work just fine for me since I tend to use it mainly for commuting and shorter trips around town. But I am drawn to the futuristic concept car look and technology of the i8 more.
No, and they won’t be for at least a decade, possibly more. The present cars, the i3 and i8, are clearly inferior to Teslas in almost every respect. They aren’t as quick, the electric range is vastly inferior (especially for the i8), they are intentionally oddly designed into the quirky niche space as opposed to Teslas mass market appeal aesthetic, they don’t have over-the-air-updates, they don’t have a fast charger network or destination charger network, route planning for charging is not integrated, their autonomous driving capabilities are inferior, they are lower efficiency on electric, etc. There are a few people who really like the i3 as a city car, and more power to them. Both are massively compromised by the internal combustion infrastructure, whether the i3 has it installed or not. And that latter part is important for their upcoming electrified cars. BMW’s strategic electric architecture is an anything architecture. Literally every vehicle will be configurable as only internal combustion, only electric or as a plug-in hybrid. This means that every vehicle has to leave space for both power trains and both storage options. That means that they will be heavier and taller than necessary, and that their electric range and possibly their gas-only range will be compromised. Even their electric-only car will have all the routing and space choices to allow fuel pumps, oil pumps, a radiator and the related tubing and wiring harnesses for them, even though none of them are needed. The extra weight and space consumption means that they are much more constrained in their design language and engineering, so they’ll have compromised aesthetics and performance. The complexity means that they will be much harder to assemble, have higher quality failures and be more expensive to assemble. The combination will turn out to be an underperforming, aesthetically inferior, more expensive choice than equivalent Teslas. It’s only advantage will be that it has the BMW badge on it. They are designing the platypus of cars, without the cuteness. And it will still be sold through BMW dealerships. Dealers don’t like electric cars, because they make most of their money on maintenance which electric cars don’t require nearly as much of. They’ll have to mark the platypuses down massively to move them off the lot, and they won’t get revenue from the pure electric versions, so they’ll be pushing the gas-only or hybrid versions wherever possible. It’s a strategy that could only be thought up by a marketing weenie with no technical understanding, likely the same guy who decided that it was important to have an almost undifferentiated vehicle for every tiny niche buying behavior, from the 1 series through the 8 series, the X variations and the M variations. Over 30 vehicles that are hard to tell apart from their siblings, and all of which perform more poorly than Teslas under conditions that people actually drive them for. And, of course, now the Tesla Model 3 is a better track car than the BMW M3 or M4, so BMW is starting behind and accelerating in the wrong direction. It will take a decade for this absurd choice to work its way through, fail and be reversed. That’s par for the course for BMW these days. The bikeshedding of the i3 and i8, from the weird and unnecessary material development choice that’s now been abandoned, to the fake engine noise pumped into the i8 interior through the stereo, is going to be repeated. The major engineering strategy is already bad, and then they will make a bunch of other bad choices driven by marketing, not engineering or car designers, so the results will be late and bad. BMW: the ultimate car for platypus lovers.
Here are the Cylinder Arrangement and variants of BMW i8 Coupe:Read More
Here are the Parking Sensor Front and variants of BMW i8 Coupe:Read More
Yes, BMW i8 Coupe is available in Rear Foglamps. The available Rear Foglamps variants are: 2019 BM…Read More