Every click of the button felt premium and the soft-touch material at every touchpoint was amazing.
New Front Fog Light Garnish**for V variant only The multiple configurations enabled by the 60:40 One Touch
in the third-row seats with relative comfort as the second-row seats can slide and recline to free up
Proton Saga armoured up a new infotainment system in the mid-life facelift.
history of creating roadsters that have stood out as icons of pure driving pleasure; from the BMW 315/1 up
For the first time, there will be a proper 320 PS Tiguan R in the line-up too.The front end is completely
Toyoda-san will also be competing in the race under his racing alter ego, Morizo.Also read: Pre-order
hydroelectric dams, not exactly the place where eccentric cars are made.If there is someone to compare Susumu-san
Before we begin - the table above is how the Fortuner line-up is marketed now, after the variant shake-up.The
commercial for the Mitsubishi Triton is probably among the better Malaysia-produced ads for a pick-up
More Honda cars on the road translates to higher Body and Paint (BP) service intakes.As of October 2019
Although the suede/leather combo feels pleasant to the touch. 2020 Mazda 2 1.5 Hatchback - Noise
It became his lifelong commitment, the reason he woke up in the morning.He was - up until his untimely
donielleWe’ve all been there, squeezing through a tighter-than-usual spot in a car park and ending up
Theres another trashed up Kancil back on the streets and it is owned by the same man.
compared to May.Although sales figures over the past two months were encouraging, year-to-date figures paint
app so they can go about their business comfortably before returning to the service centre to pick up
We San Francisco firefighters drove right into the heart of the Kincade Fire to help those in need.
Touch ‘n Go has reiterated yet again that it will soon remove all parking surcharges.
Perodua has successfully held its first-ever Body & Paint (B&P) Skill Contest in a move to step
and despite having a low average paint thickness of 88.9 μm, every panel has a consistent finish
Granted, we’re only looking at photos rather than up close, so what’s the deal with this
PS and 260 Nm of torque.Exterior features on the new Nissan Kicks include LED headlamps, dual-tone paint
The bend lighting function (EVS) optimises visibility at speeds of up to 90 km/h.
VinFast VF33Vietnamese car brand VinFast is planning to set up an electric vehicle (EV) factory in the
Door 113 103 C-Pillar 117 123 Tailgate 105 Roof 127 Average paint
19 - 25 October 2019 Fuel price update: RON 97 up by 1 cent Monday PLUS highway celebrates successful
Proton has filed for several new trademarks.The trademarks that Proton has filed for include “iN-Touch
not help to repair car scratches.While toothpaste contains mild abrasives, it is not enough to remove paint
updated for 2020.Both the Alphard’s and Vellfire’s list of safety features have been bumped up
GUNDAM Exia Repair II Metallic Version San Diego Comic Con Exclusive. Just gotta touch up with some paint still.
Wow look at this stadium in #SanDiego w/ a football field in it - who woulda thought - after 21 years I almost didnt recognize it - it could use some TLC & touch-up paint but i’ll have to say it still looks pretty darn good & seats 70k - oh yeah, it must be the #HolidayBowl
New post: Paint Touch-Up San Diego Bumperdoc Customer Story
< #bitcoinclub #sandiego Touch-up paint & vehicle fuses (I-15 & El… #bitcoin #BitMarket
Need to go down to San Diego and touch up the paint on the trim, windows, & doors, but Giuseppe won't be able to go until sometime this Fall
Viper Bumper Scuff Repair – San Diego Mobile Scratch Repair-Paint Touch Up http://dlvr.it/24k1wx
Some of the other answers talk about a wall being ineffective and state that we (racist republicans) just need to stop hiring illegals. Mike Szarko states that illegals don’t take our jobs and if they do take our jobs then our jobs are worthless. I’ll touch on that later. Why we need a wall: ,First, the point of the wall is to keep them out. Once they’re in the country we’ve already lost. Once they enter, have a child or are even arrested and released, they’re costing us money. Don’t believe me? Visit any ER tonight, at midnight. Once an illegal crosses that border they are afforded certain rights by the US. We want to prevent them entering illegally. Ideally, they can claim asylum at a port of entry, wait to be processed in Mexico, and accept that result. Will a wall work: ,I didn’t think so. However, I ran into two border agents that I knew from highschool. Both are Hispanic. I asked them. They said that it won’t solve the problem 100% but it would be a valuable tool and drastically reduce the illegal immigration problem. They also said the estimates of illegals entering are grossly low. I’m on a boat: ,another popular reply is that a wall would just force illegals to use boats bc, you know, they did it from Cuba. I’ve been off the coast near the border on some scuba diving trips. It’s no picinic. Also, boats and gas cost money. The point of illegal immigration is financial. If it’s fear of persecution then claim asylum. So these poor immigrants who can barely afford a coyote are now able to afford a trip on a boat. That’s going to exponentially increase the cost of transport. Plus, the coast guard is well funded and well equipped. How many boats get captured by the coast guard before the cartels coyotes say, “its way more lucrative to just transport drugs.” There’s only so much boat space and cocaine pays better than poor Hondurans. Tunnels: ,the new border wall is supposed to go pretty deep but they could dig tunnels. I asked my border agent friends about this. They both said, “good! Go for it.” They explained that tunnels take time and effort and once they were being used they could be quickly identified with drones equipped with thermal imaging or whatever. It would basically funnel the illegals in choke points that could be identified. The tunnels in San Diego are for smuggling drugs, not for smuggling hundred of families. Those tunnels are money makers in the drug trade. Again, cocaine is more profitable than illegal immigrants. Jobs: ,Mike Szarko states that illegals don’t take our jobs. Well, they don’t take jobs like mine. However, they do take jobs. My lawn guy is a 25 yr old white dude. He owns his own yard company and works really hard. A few weeks ago I get a knock on my door and a Hispanic guy asks me if I need any yard work done. His English was very broken and he offered to do the yard for half of what I was paying. It was tempting but I’ve gotten to know my yard guy pretty well so I declined. I did ask him if he was here illegally and he said yes. Last week I had a guy stop by the house asking for work. He mentioned he did painting. I just bought a new house and my wife wanted the inside painted. The quote we had from a professional painter was $5000. This guys agreed to do it for $1800. He did a damn good job for $1800. Another job lost. Sorry American paint company. So yes, they do take some of our jobs. Many illegals also work the kitchens at your favorite restaurants. I know this bc I know restaurant owners. These people make up social security numbers so the owners don’t know but they suspect. Some say these are jobs Americans won’t do. That’s bullshit. You pay me enough and I’ll do any job. Illegal workers drive wages down to the point that Americans won’t take those jobs. Yes, we do seem to need a wall. And let’s be honest, it’s not about $5 billion. It’s about thwarting trump. It’s a political stunt. Many people want a wall. Click here to support We The People Will Fund The Wall organized by Brian Kolfage
I arrived at Bootcamp in February 1968 at MCRD San Diego. The Vietnam War was white hot and the Tet Offensive was in progress. Our training was best described as brutal and intense, it was not a game. Full Metal Jacket was spot on for the most part, at least the Bootcamp portion, the rest of the movie, not so much. There was a lot of physical abuse from our DIs. I was hit and chocked more times than I can count. As a squad leader, if someone in my squad screwed up, I was called to the duty hut and choked and beaten, then told to go back and “tighten up” AKA blanket party, for the private that screwed up. During a couple of our inspections an officer would go through the ranks, and randomly ask questions of the recruits. He would ask such things like what’s your 2nd General Order, etc., rifle number, why did you joined the Marine Corps. One private was asked why he joined the Marine Corps and he replied, “for Aviation guaranteed sir ”. After the inspection was over, the platoon was called out on to the Platoon Street. Then the DI called out that same private and asked him that same question, whereby he got the same reply. The DI promptly knocked the Private to the deck, then grabbed him by the throat, pulled him to his feet and said, “now puke, next time someone asks you why you joined the Marines you will answer, “you joined the Marines to kill Gooks”. So the DI repeated the question, “Private, why did you join the Marines?” The Private replied this time, “to kill Gooks sir.” The DI knocked the Private to the deck again, dragged him to his feet by the throat and told him, “my wife’s a Gook.” There’s never a right answer. The DIs made no secrete that they could get into trouble hitting recruits. They told us from the start, if you little girls don’t have the balls to take it, all you have to do to get my stripes is go cry to your mommies or write your Congressman. Our most sadistic DI got moved to a different Platoon in the same series. There someone did just that, reported him. I heard he went up for Court Martial but no Private in the Platoon would testify against him so he got off, and the snitch was basically shunned the rest of his time in Bootcamp. This kind of abuse was common but got particularly bad at the rifle range, especially for those that weren’t that good a shot. A Non-qual is considered the lowest form of life in the Marine Corps. The night before qual day it all loosened up, and our platoon actually had a little party in the squad bay. There were no refreshments, but just, singing and joking around with the DI. Our Platoon won the rifle range and after that the physical abuse stopped for the most part. We went on an won Honor Platoon. If anyone asks me if Full Metal Jacket was accurate, I have to say yes, only it was much worse. Bootcamp was hard, it hardened you physically but mostly it hardened you mentally. After Bootcamp everyone went to Camp Pendleton for ITR. The Grunts went to Horno, and the POGs went to San Onofre for an abbreviated ITR. I was at Horno and for me ITR was much harder and challenging than Bootcamp. It was a different kind of hard from Bootcamp. There was no PT, but it was much harder physically, long marches, heavy loads, very little sleep. We had no physical abuse, were now called Marines, not pukes, maggots or ladies like we were as boots. To me it seemed what the Marine Corps was doing would be analogous to kicking and beating a young Pit Bull dog every day for several months while keeping him tied and muzzled. Then you drop him in a pit with another dog and tell him to KILL. Actually by that time you don’t have to say a thing, he just does it out of instinct and unleashed anger. POST SCRIPT: First of all I would like to thank everyone for the all your upvotes to my post, I really feel honored. I’d also like to thank all of the other Vets from all branches out there, for your service. Only those who have lived it can really understand. After reading the other replies to this post I would like to make some additional comments to clarify my impression of Full Metal Jacket. When I said the bootcamp portion of Full Metal Jacket was “spot on”, I was referring only to the physical abuse I experienced and witnessed. This was not unique to my platoon. It was a common topic of conversation among Marines, to swap Bootcamp stories of who had had the most sadistic DI’s. I just touched the surface of what I saw and experienced regarding abuse, that could be a story all by itself. There were differences however in the movie from my personal memories of bootcamp. It was highly unlikely a recruit would have a live round in the barracks. We did have access to our M14 rifles, they were kept locked to our racks with one of the two combination locks we were issued. Ammo however was strictly issued out on the range and a record of every shot taken was recorded. Being able to keep rounds you were issued would have been virtually impossible. I did hear stories of recruits cutting out a slot in the New Testament Bible we were issued in order to hide in it the “first” round issued to them in the Corps. That was probably just an urban legend, I never actually knew anyone who had actually done it, just someone who knew someone. Other differences were that in Full Metal Jacket there was just one DI featured where we had three. However there usually was only one on duty at a time. The Bootcamp scenery in the movie didn’t match the images seared into my mind. At the time I was there it was very crowded, lots of activity, other platoons were always training all around you. Always the sound of cadence in the background, plus the frequent roar of jets, AKA “freedom birds” taking off and landing at nearby Lindberg Field. In the movie it was like there was just this one platoon and one DI. The Movie was supposed to be at PI so I understand it would look different from San Diego. I was at MCRD San Diego, and when I was there the set of Gomer Pyle USMC looks more familiar to me than that of Full Metal Jacket, especially the opening scene where Gomer is out marching with his platoon on the grinder. I spent many hours drilling on that very grinder, the same grinder, by the way, my father had drilled on in 1942. In 1968 there were no barracks at MCRD San Diego like shown in the movie, only quonset huts like in Gomer Pyle, and we were only in those quonset huts for our first two weeks, before moving to tents. Our only time spent in barracks was at Edson Range which, were similar to the one shown in the movie. Our last week or so at MCRD we did go back into the quonset huts. We did have nice barracks at Horno during ITR, however we spent very little time in them. After ITR, we moved across Basilone Road, and back into tents for BITS. Hope this will help paint a clearer picture of what Marine Corps Bootcamp was like, at least at MCRD San Diego during the Vietnam War.
I was in radio, San Diego at KPRi for 18 years as a morning show host. I met a ton of great people. These are all first hand and anecdotal. Sting: August 22, 2000. I remember this date for a lot of reasons. Sting was playing at the Coors Amphitheater . I was invited to interview him by the record label. I took along a mini-disc recorder. Arriving his people took me to the green room where there was a spread of fruits and vegetables. Nothing lavish. His road manager took me out and there, sitting in the shade backstage was Sting. We exchanged hellos and I took out the disc recorder and he asked if he could look at it. Sting- “I hope you don’t mind if I eat a little fruit… my throat is ragged… I’m eating pineapple and yellow watermelon… they are really good for the throat… “ Me- “Not a problem… please go right ahead.” He pointed to the mini-disc recorder in my hand. Sting- “What exactly is this?” Me- “That’s a mini-disc recorder… You’ve seen them before right?” Sting- “I’ve heard of them but never held one… Wow, it’s small… It’s digital?” Me- “Yes and it’s got a great microphone.” Sting- “I don’t know if you want to do that with me… Digital stuff and me always seem to have a problem.” Me- “What do you mean?” Sting- “Well I once did a digital recording in a studio and we thought it was a perfect take. And when we went to play it back it crashed and we lost the take… So I’ve stayed away from them. So good luck.” We talked about the origins of his music. Sting- “I don’t know where it comes from… Sometimes I just wake up with it and write it down. I don’t think about it too much. “ Me- “Are you critical of your own work?” Sting- “You know… I really write for me… and if I like it, that’s really all that matters to me. Did I do a good job? That’s about it… of course if Trudy likes it, that makes me happy and if the children like it that’s icing on the cake. But really I write to write a good song… Speaking of Trudy, it’s our anniversary today. She’s wandering around here somewhere.” I mentioned that some of our listeners had run into him when we sent them on a trip to Barcelona. They won tickets and the trip and were sight-seeing and found him sitting on the edge of a fountain. Sting- “Yeah… that’s kind of a great way to relax… just the sound of the water up close. I hope I was nice to them!” Me- “They said you were very nice and sent me a picture with you.” I asked if I could ask him a more personal question about the complaints some people make about artists using their popularity to back causes. Me- “Aren’t you worried that the record label cringes when you show up in a news story and all of a sudden people get really angry at you because they think you should keep quiet?” Sting- “That’s a problem for me. Not the talking, the keeping quiet. You see a lot of different things and meet a lot of different people in what I get to do. There’s a lot of injustice in the world. I’ve been blessed to have been successful. But there are a lot of people who are really having a rough go of it and for all kinds of reasons, they aren’t getting help. I think I owe it to people to help them if I can and if speaking up about it causes problems for the record label I really don’t care. I have a lot of faith in people to do the right thing when they know what’s going on. Especially the people who listen to my music.” I brought up the song “Russians” which he’d done in the mid-80s while there was still a cold war. Me- “There a line in that song that really upset a lot of people ‘I hope the Russians love their children too’.” Sting - “Well I do… when politicians go around threatening each other, it’s dangerous for everyone.” Me- “There was a lot of backlash about this. And many US radio stations stopped playing your records.” Sting- “My dad told me that ‘if you are going to be a tall tree, you’re going to get struck by lightning.’ I don’ t worry about it so much.” At that point, Trudy walked up and Sting gave her a kiss and she sat in his lap… Sting- “It’s our 8th anniversary… and she hasn’t kicked me out yet!” Trudy- “You’d be homeless.” and they laughed. I gave Sting a group of small paintings (inspired by his music) that an artist and listener of the radio station had asked me to pass on to him. He looked them over and said to please tell her thank you and then we said goodbye. Before I walked away, I told him that my pregnant wife was going to be in the “meet and greet” after the show and he said he’d look for her. Then as I was leaving he said… Sting- “Madison, make sure you try the yellow watermelon… there’s really nothing like it.” I’d heard all kinds of stories about how he had a great big ego… I didn’t see it. That night he met my wife and asked her if we knew “boy or girl”. We did not. He asked if he could predict the sex of our baby by touching her belly. She said yes… Sting- “It’s going to be a boy!” On September 11, 2000 our daughter Julia was born… What can you say… He’s a rock star… and a damn nice one at that.
The 1986 Murder of Sherri Rasmussen On February 24, 1986, the body of Sherri Rasmussen was found in the apartment she shared with her husband, John Ruetten, in California. She had been beaten and shot three times in a struggle. The LAPD initially considered the case a botched burglary, and were unable to identify a suspect but Rasmussen's father believed that LAPD officer, Stephanie Lazarus, who maintained a relationship with Ruetten, was a prime suspect. Sherri Rasmussen John Ruetten Stephanie Lazarus While an undergraduate at the University of California, Los Angeles John Ruetten, a mechanical engineering major from San Diego, occasionally dated Stephanie Lazarus, a fellow Dykstra Hall resident and a political science major from Simi Valley, California. Both were avid athletes; Lazarus played on UCLA's junior varsity women's basketball team. Lazarus would steal Ruetten's clothes when he showered and take photographs of him naked while he slept. Ruetten never considered the relationship as anything more than "necking and fooling around." They had sex for the first time after he graduated, when he accepted a job with hard-drive manufacturer Micropolis and she applied to the city's police academy, becoming a uniformed officer with the LAPD. In court, he later testified that they had sex "twenty to thirty times" between 1981 and 1984, but that she was never his girlfriend. Ruetten later met Sherri Rasmussen, a graduate of Loma Linda University who was on a fast career track in critical care nursing. She entered college at 16, and by her late 20s was the director of nursing at Glendale Adventist Medical Center, giving presentations and teaching classes for fellow nurses. At one point, Lazarus threw Ruetten a surprise party on his 25th birthday, unaware that he had been dating other women or that he had developed a serious relationship with Rasmussen. When she learned he was seriously involved with Rasmussen, Lazarus was despondent. "I'm truly in love with John and the past year has really torn me up," Lazarus wrote to Ruetten's mother in August 1985. "I wish it didn't end the way it did, and I don't think I'll ever understand his decision." In her own journal, she wrote, "I really don't feel like working. I found out that John is getting married." Depressed, Lazarus visited Ruetten at his condo, and the two had sex "to give her closure," Ruetten testified years later, for what he says was the only time before Rasmussen's death. Later that night, Lazarus awoke a fellow officer she roomed with to commiserate. During their engagement, Lazarus brought her skis to the apartment Ruetten shared with Rasmussen and asked him to wax them, and despite Rasmussen's objections, he complied. Rasmussen felt this was a little strange, since Lazarus was dressed in flattering workout clothes, and after Lazarus left, his fiancée asked if their relationship was truly over. Ruetten convinced her the two were just friends. A few days later Lazarus returned to pick up the waxed skis, in uniform and armed, after Ruetten had already left for work. Rasmussen was unnerved by these visits and pleaded with Ruetten to tell Lazarus to stop coming by. Ruetten only said there was nothing to their relationship and that she should ignore Lazarus. According to Nels Rasmussen, Sherri's father, Lazarus later visited Rasmussen at her office to tell her that things were not over between her and Ruetten and told Rasmussen, "If I can't have John, no one else will." Shortly before her death, Rasmussen again confided to her father her fear that Lazarus was stalking her on the street. Ruetten and Rasmussen were married in November 1985. On the fateful morning, Ruetten left the couple's condominium to go to work. Rasmussen was scheduled to give a motivational speech at work that day, a managerial tactic she did not feel was effective. To avoid it, she told Ruetten she might call in sick, using a back injury she had incurred while doing aerobics the day before as an excuse. At 9:45 a.m., a neighbor noticed that the Ruettens' garage door was open, with no car visible. Approximately fifteen minutes later, Ruetten made the first of several unanswered calls home over the course of the day. Rasmussen's sister also called without answer. At noon, two men, who the neighbor believed were gardeners in the compound, gave her and her husband a purse they found that turned out to be Rasmussen's. A maid cleaning a nearby unit said she heard something that sounded like two people fighting, and then something falling, at around 12:30 p.m. When Ruetten returned home in the evening, he found his garage door open and broken glass on the driveway. In addition, he discovered that the BMW he bought for Rasmussen as an engagement gift was missing. Because of Rasmussen's morning plans, he found it strange that she would have later gone out without letting him know. The house's answering machine had not been activated, despite both of them usually activating it when leaving the house unoccupied. Inside, Ruetten found Rasmussen dead on the living room floor, shot three times. There were signs of a struggle, such as a porcelain vase that had apparently been broken over Rasmussen's head prior to the shooting, a bloody handprint next to the burglar alarm's panic button, and a toppled credenza. It appeared that someone at least attempted to bind Rasmussen at one point. She had defensive wounds and a bruise on her face that appeared to have been inflicted by the muzzle of a gun. The gun had been fired through a quilted blanket, apparently to muffle the sound. The investigating criminalist also observed a bite mark on Rasmussen's arm, and took a swab from it. LAPD detectives investigating the case quickly concluded that Rasmussen had been surprised and killed by a burglar. Rasmussen's attire (a bathrobe, nightgown, and underwear) suggested she was not expecting visitors. Although a maid in a neighboring unit reported hearing screaming and fighting earlier in the day, she did not recall hearing gunshots. She thought the whole event had been a domestic dispute and did not call police. It appeared that the perpetrator had been in the process of taking electronic equipment when Rasmussen came upon them, and as a result, jewelry had been left behind and the vehicle taken as a getaway. The abandoned BMW was recovered a week later; it yielded no new evidence. The only other thing that appeared to have been taken from the home was the couple's marriage license. Lead detective Lyle Mayer did consider other possibilities. He quickly ruled out the grieving Ruetten as a suspect. Ruetten quit his job and moved away from Los Angeles shortly after the murder. Nels Rasmussen and his wife, Loretta, told Mayer about Lazarus' harassment, and that he made a note of it. Ruetten later told police that he and Rasmussen never discussed Lazarus. Regardless, the police remained focused on the possibility of burglary, especially in light of one reported later in the same area, in which one of the two reported suspects had been carrying a gun, possibly a .38 caliber like the one that had fired the three bullets into Rasmussen that were later identified by experts as Federal .38J Plus-P. Mayer's partner, Steve Hooks, found the bite mark unusual, as bites during struggles are much more commonly inflicted by women, while the majority of burglars are men. However, because men have bitten opponents during fights as well, the burglary theory stood. The suspected burglars to whom detectives ascribed the crime remained at large, despite a follow-up newspaper story eight months later and a reward offered by the Rasmussen family. The LAPD, preoccupied with the violence resulting from gang wars and the crack epidemic plaguing the city at the time, was unable to devote much more attention to the case. Detectives at the Van Nuys office were, the Rasmussens say, often unhelpful when the family called, hanging up or putting them on hold. A year after the murder, the frustrated family reiterated their offer at a press conference and called for more action. Nels wrote to Daryl Gates, then chief of the LAPD, about the possibility that Lazarus might have been involved. Detectives told him he "watch[ed] too much television." He continued to publicize the reward, and later worked with the short-lived television series Murder One on a segment inspired by the case. Nels in particular was unconvinced that Sherri, who had been 6ft tall, had a large frame, and was in good physical shape, had been the victim of a botched burglary. It would have been a struggle for anyone to subdue her in close quarters, and Mayer had told him at one point that the events may have lasted an hour and a half, a long time for burglars primarily after items of value in the home. Further, whoever shot his daughter had fired directly into her chest at close range and taken the trouble to muffle the shot with the quilt, suggesting that the killing was deliberate and not the accidental byproduct of a struggle. Mayer eventually retired, and the new detective assigned to the case told Nels that he was unable to follow up on Mayer's notes and did not think that any new leads would emerge. Nels was rebuffed again in 1993 when he offered to pay for DNA testing on the evidence from the murder, now that the technology was available; he was told that the police had to have a suspect in order to proceed with testing. Lazarus briefly reunited with Ruetten in 1989; Mayer's notes show that Ruetten had called him and asked if he was absolutely sure there was no evidence linking Lazarus with his late wife's death. In the meantime, Lazarus continued working with the LAPD; she went on to start her own private investigation firm, Unique Investigations. In 1987, she earned medals, including one gold, at the World Police and Fire Games in San Diego. In 1993, after stints at the department's Drug Abuse Resistance Education and internal affairs divisions, she became a detective. Three years later, she married a fellow officer and adopted a daughter with him; at work, she became an instructor at the police academy. Ruetten eventually remarried as well; he did not pressure the police as his former father-in-law had. In the late 1990s, after DNA testing had become more prominent, the LAPD formed a new unit that looked through the forensic evidence collected from the department's cold case files to determine whether any had the potential for new leads through DNA testing. Among the evidence seen as likely to do so was that collected from the Rasmussen residence. However, it was not until 2004 that another criminalist, Jennifer Francis, was able to analyze it. Some of the evidence from the Rasmussen case, including that which might have contained the suspect's DNA, was missing, having been collected in 1993 by another detective. Francis did not find any matches in the Combined DNA Index System database, but did find that the saliva in it had come from a female, undermining the initial detectives' burglary theory. Several years later, Francis claimed that, unusually, she had access to not just the sample but the entire case file, which had been given to her to help her decide which other samples to analyze. Upon discovering that the biter and likely perpetrator was female, she reviewed it and came across a report of a "third-party female" who had allegedly harassed the victim at her job and residence before the murder. Francis asked the detective supervising her if this woman had been investigated, to which he supposedly responded with, "Oh, you mean the LAPD detective." He elaborated that the woman, a former girlfriend of the victim's husband, was in fact a current LAPD detective but "she's not a part of this." He insisted that the case was simply a burglary as the department had long concluded. No other detective would pursue the case, and the evidence went back into the files. By 2009, crime in Los Angeles had declined enough from its earlier levels that detectives began looking into cold cases to increase their clearance rates. In Van Nuys, Jim Nuttall and Pete Barba reviewed the Rasmussen file and found it interesting enough to be worth pursuing. Because the DNA test pointed to a female suspect, they decided the burglary theory was invalid and they would have to start from the beginning. Nuttall and Barba looked at the case as a murder, with the burglary staged to throw the police off the trail. Many aspects of the crime were improbable for a break-in, especially one committed in daylight: Rasmussen's jewelry box, an inviting target for a burglar, was in plain view atop her dresser and had not been touched. The condo was in the middle of a gated complex, surrounded by other units from which burglars could have expected to be easily observed. The front door had an alarm warning, and had not been forced open, as it might have been if the putative burglars had not expected anyone to be at home. Inside, a key aspect of the crime scene was also inconsistent with the burglary theory. At the top of the stairs was a stack of stereo equipment atop a VCR. If, as the evidence suggested, the struggle between Rasmussen and her attacker had begun upstairs and then continued downstairs, that stack would likely have been knocked downstairs and scattered as well. It made more sense to assume that it had been stacked afterwards, when an actual burglar would have fled the scene immediately after the shooting. The forensics reinforced this theory. On a record player atop the stack was a thumb-shaped bloodstain. It had no print, suggesting whoever left it was wearing gloves to avoid leaving identification. But the blood was Rasmussen's, suggesting the equipment had been stacked after the struggle and shooting. It had been left behind, the detectives realized, to make the crime look like something other than what it really was. From the four bound volumes of the case file they developed a list of five female suspects. Nuttall was taken aback when Ruetten told him over the phone that Lazarus was a police officer. By then, Lazarus had been promoted to a higher level of detective and was working art theft cases as part of the Commercial Crimes Division. As one of the two detectives in the nation's only full-time unit devoted to that specialty, Lazarus had gained some local media attention when she and her partner had recovered a statue stolen from Carthay Circle. To better understand the field, she told a local newspaper, she had begun learning to paint. Off the job, Lazarus had been active in the Los Angeles Women Police Officers Association and organized childcare for families of officers. She also made chocolate-covered cherries and homemade soap for her neighbors in Simi Valley for Christmas. Since Lazarus was still with the department, Nuttall and Barba realized they would have to proceed carefully. Still, they ranked Lazarus as the least promising of the five suspects, since they read in the files that she and Ruetten had ended any relationship they had had over the summer before the murder. Nuttall and Barba's investigations soon eliminated all but one of the other women. The other, a former coworker of Rasmussen's who had had some disputes with her, was eliminated by a covertly collected DNA sample. With only Lazarus left, they kept their investigation a closely guarded secret; not only did her husband also work in Commercial Crimes Division as a detective, she may have had other friends who could have tipped her off. If she were the killer, she could have improved her defense; if she were not, then they could have unintentionally smeared a fellow officer who had had an unblemished service record over the course of her career, with no disciplinary investigations or civilian complaints. They only referred to her as "No.5", worked on the case after hours or behind closed doors, and developed cover stories to explain why they wanted to look at personnel records for one particular officer from 20 years ago. The detectives began looking into other aspects of Lazarus' life during the mid-1980s. Another detective recalled that at that time, most LAPD officers had preferred a .38 as their backup or off-duty carry gun; in fact they were required to only purchase weapons compatible with the Federal Plus-P ammunition that had been used in the murder. State and departmental records showed that Lazarus had indeed owned a Smith & Wesson Model 49 .38 at the time, and reported it stolen to Santa Monica police (but not to her own department's armorer) thirteen days after the murder. Since the location where Lazarus had reported it stolen from was near a popular pier, they assumed she had thrown the gun into the Pacific Ocean. Without the weapon, DNA would be the only definite way to connect the crime to Lazarus. Nuttall and Barba theorized from their own experience about how an LAPD officer would commit a murder. It would be better to do it on a day off, and departmental records showed that Lazarus had indeed been off the day Sherri Rasmussen was killed. An officer would know better than to use his or her duty gun, since it would have to be disposed of after the crime and the penalties for losing a duty gun or failing to prevent its theft were severe. Instead it made sense to use a backup gun like Lazarus' .38. Lastly, a working patrol officer would know how to do just enough to make the crime scene look like an interrupted burglary to satisfy an overworked detective. Nels told Nuttall about Lazarus' continued contact with his daughter, which had not been in the files, despite him mentioning it frequently during Mayer and Hook's interviews. Realizing that Lazarus was now their prime suspect, the detectives informed their superiors and arranged to discreetly collect a voluntarily discarded DNA sample from her, knowing they could do so without having to get a warrant, which would have let Lazarus know she was under investigation. While off-duty running errands, Lazarus discarded a cup from which she had been drinking, which other police retrieved. A sample was taken from it, and it matched the DNA from the bite mark on Sherri Rasmussen. Rob Bub, the homicide detective supervisor at Van Nuys, began letting his senior officers, all the way up to Chief William Bratton, know of the case along with senior prosecutors from the Los Angeles County District Attorney's office. It was transferred to the Robbery-Homicide Division, which handled many of the department's high-profile cases, including the art theft bureau where Lazarus herself worked. Her arrest was planned carefully. On the day of the arrest in June 2009, dozens of officers arose before dawn. After being briefed on a search warrant they were told would be executed outside the city, but with few details beyond that, they went to wait near Lazarus' home in Simi Valley and that city's Metrolink station, where Lazarus commuted to the city. A short time later, detectives from the RHD who had been selected for their lack of personal connection to Lazarus called her from the lockup at Parker Center, the department's headquarters. Bratton had ordered that location be used since Lazarus would have to surrender her gun in order to enter it, limiting the possibility she might resist violently when she was arrested (immediately following the interview, as was the plan) or realized that she was the prime suspect. The detectives, Greg Stearns and Dan Jaramillo, told her they had someone in custody who wanted to talk about an art theft. After Lazarus had checked in her gun and entered the interrogation room, they explained that this was really about some loose ends they were trying to tie up in the Rasmussen case, since her name had come up in the investigation. They claimed they wanted a private setting because, while Ruetten was an old boyfriend, Lazarus had long been married to someone else and they did not want her private life to become the subject of office gossip. Stearns and Jaramillo knew they would have to tread carefully since Lazarus herself was well aware of police interview techniques and her rights to silence and legal counsel, which she could invoke at any time. They rambled and digressed from the subject at times, sometimes discussing unrelated police business, but eventually came back to Rasmussen. Lazarus claimed to recall little due to the intervening years, but gradually revealed more and more knowledge, including oblique acknowledgements of her visits to the Ruetten condo and a specific encounter at Rasmussen's office, until she accused her colleagues of considering her a suspect. The detectives mentioned it was possible they had DNA evidence from the crime scene, and requested DNA samples from Lazarus. Lazarus declined and thereafter left the room. She was immediately arrested and charged with the murder. Once she had been arrested, the teams in Simi Valley began searching Lazarus' home and car. In her house they found her journal from the mid-1980s, with numerous mentions of her love for Ruetten and her despondence over his engagement to Rasmussen but no mentions of her gun having been stolen. Her computer showed that she had searched the Internet for Ruetten's name on several occasions during the late 1990s. As the investigating detectives had been, many LAPD officers were stunned at the idea that Lazarus might have murdered someone. Fellow detectives recalled her as vivacious and supportive, although some also recalled that her behavior when angry had led some to refer to her as "Spazarus" behind her back. A case she had been developing from her art-theft work, with elder abuse and real estate fraud aspects, had to be dropped since it was highly unlikely that it could be prosecuted successfully if the lead investigator herself were facing a murder charge. Lazarus was convicted of the murder in 2012 and is serving a sentence of 27 years to life for first-degree murder at the California Institution for Women. Source:
There are many variations throughout the United States. Each State has their own economy, zoning . . . culture, and all of these factors reflect within the local architecture, readily available material, and price point. The cheapest homes in the US are going to be found in the poorest States. These can be single family homes that are stick built 30 years ago with 2,000 square feet (186 sq. meters) and all new everything inside with an acre of land for $80,000: The photo above is of a home currently on the market for $82,000 just northeast of Montgomery, AL. Link: ,1823 County Road 79, Billingsley, AL 36006 | MLS #474131 This home, if plopped down next door to me, would cost $800,000 (actually more, given the size of the property, but I liked the symmetry). Working the other way, an $80,000 home of that quality and size in my State of California . . . doesn’t exist. So, since these comparisons are very much regional in a country the size, and economic levels of the US, I am going to go with the less political, and more regional approach of the term. Even in my region, Southern California, the home prices differ greatly between county to county. I’ll narrow it down to San Diego County, as I watch this market most. So, for multifamily homes: Cheapest (typical): This is the cheapest I can find, at $75,000. It is 2 bedrooms and 2 bath, a bit over 1,100 sf (102 sq. m) and located in Borrego Springs. It gets hot there, but this place has full air conditioning, and the home owner’s association fees pay for the local pool and clubhouse perks (an extra $480 per month). There is also a golf course, but I think those fees are extra. Link: ,https://www.redfin.com/CA/Borrego-Springs/1630-Las-Casitas-Dr-92004/home/3640534?utm_source=ios_share&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=copy_link&utm_nooverride=1&utm_content=link If you want to get closer to downtown San Diego, you’ll have to (almost) double your budget and be at least 55 years old. This place is located just north of Balboa Park. It is a 352 sf (33 sq. m) studio condominium, and I believe the HOA fees are $255 per month. I viewed the interior picture, and this place needs new paint, and all new floors. HOA will take care of anything structural, though. Link: ,https://www.redfin.com/CA/San-Diego/3776-Alabama-St-92104/unit-C201/home/5380079?utm_source=ios_share&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=copy_link&utm_nooverride=1&utm_content=link Most expensive: Penthouse suite on Banker’s Hill. This is an 8 bedroom, 12 bath condominium with more perks than I really ever thought a person would require (HOA fees help obtain this luxury at $5,417 per month, so, you know, use them). The place is 13,527 sf (1.256,7 sq. m). A tennis court is 7,200 sf (667 sq. m). We’ll need vaulted ceilings and a few structural beams, but, we can have our own indoor court, with view, and still have a very large house . . . Just saying . . . I’m not bitter. The cost is $16,500,000 but will go up, as the shell of the house is just waiting for the buyer to put their personal touches on it. And if you can’t afford that, don’t worry, La Jolla has a place going for a third the cost right now, but you’ll have to make due with only a quarter the living space . . . better views, though. Link: ,https://www.redfin.com/CA/San-Diego/2604-Fifth-Ave-92103/unit-9th-Floor/home/171828154?utm_source=ios_share&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=copy_link&utm_nooverride=1&utm_content=link And, if you just can’t swing that last $3,000,000, there is a 20 bed, 24 bath penthouse in Little Italy with a bit more square footage just down the street. Link: As a comparison between the two, the cheapest and most expensive multi-family units are located about 3 miles (4.8 km) from each other. For single family: Cheapest (typical): This is about the cheapest single family home (loose translation on that, as single family usually implies you own the property beneath you; this home rents the property beneath them). It is 528 sf (49 sq. m) and $38,000. It is located pretty central to downtown Chula Vista. If you want to pay $50,000, you can double your living area, but the commute to downtown will be doubled, as well. Link: ,https://www.redfin.com/CA/Chula-Vista/350-Broadway-91910/unit-35/home/17203541?utm_source=ios_share&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=copy_link&utm_nooverride=1&utm_content=link Most expensive: Phew — okay . . . San Diego County does not lack in this department. We have Rancho Santa Fe which can compete with the Bay Area for private ostentation (is that a thing) and Del Mar, which has no rival for public ostentation (which is just ostentation . . . I think). There are some glorious ranches on hundreds of acres in the mountains and country of San Diego, but none of these (currently) rival La Jolla’s offering. For your consideration: On 32 acres of La Jolla hilltop (that’s correct), this 10 bedroom, 14 bath home spreads over 22,897 sf. It has views of Catalina Island (Los Angeles County) and Mexico (a very small fractional view of the Country, so there . . . again, I’m not bitter). I don’t see an HOA fee, so, if you want to park your broken down junker truck in the driveway, no biggy. And the schools are great - you know, due to how school fees are a percentage of the property value, so, the local educational system within the La Jolla area is very well funded - so there’s that. Link: ,https://www.redfin.com/CA/La-Jolla/7007-Country-Club-Dr-92037/home/4921222?utm_source=ios_share&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=copy_link&utm_nooverride=1&utm_content=link And, just as a bonus, Los Angeles County has this on the market within the last 8 months (I’m too lazy to see if it is still listed: If you ever saw the Beverly Hillbillies show in the 1960’s, this is the place. If you have $195,000,000, you can get lost in the gardens. Here is a link with that home, and a few others: ,The 20 most expensive houses for sale in LA Edit: added links to homes mentioned.
We leave behind trace chemicals, molecules and microbes on every object we touch. By sampling the molecules on cell phones, researchers at University of California San Diego School of Medicine and Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences were able to construct lifestyle sketches for each phone's owner, including diet, preferred hygiene products, health status and locations visited. This proof-of-concept study, published November 14 by ,Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,, could have a number of applications, including criminal profiling, airport screening, medication adherence monitoring, clinical trial participant stratification and environmental exposure studies. You can imagine a scenario where a crime scene investigator comes across a personal object—like a phone, pen or key—without fingerprints or DNA, or with prints or DNA not found in the database. They would have nothing to go on to determine who that belongs to," said senior author Pieter Dorrestein, PhD, professor in UC San Diego School of Medicine and Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. "So we thought—what if we take advantage of left-behind skin chemistry to tell us what kind of lifestyle this person has?" In a 2015 study , Dorrestein's team constructed 3-D models to illustrate the molecules and microbes found at hundreds of locations on the bodies of two healthy adult volunteers. Despite a three-day moratorium on personal hygiene products before the samples were collected, the researchers were surprised to find that the most abundant molecular features in the skin swabs still came from hygiene and beauty products, such as sunscreen. "All of these chemical traces on our bodies can transfer to objects," Dorrestein said. "So we realized we could probably come up with a profile of a person's lifestyle based on chemistries we can detect on objects they frequently use."Thirty-nine healthy adult volunteers participated in Dorrestein's latest study. The team swabbed four spots on each person's cell phone—an object we tend to spend a lot of time touching—and eight spots on each person's right hand, for a total of nearly 500 samples. Then they used a technique called mass spectrometry to detect molecules from the samples. They identified as many molecules as possible by comparing them to reference structures in the GNPS , data base crowdsourced mass spectrometry knowledge repository and annotation website developed by Dorrestein and co-author Nuno Bandeira, PhD, associate professor at the Jacobs School of Engineering and Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences at UC San Diego. With this information, the researchers developed a personalized lifestyle "read-out" from each phone. Some of the medications they detected on phones included anti-inflammatory and anti-fungal skin creams, hair loss treatments, anti-depressants and eye drops. Food molecules included citrus, caffeine, herbs and spices. Sunscreen ingredients and DEET mosquito repellant were detected on phones even months after they had last been used by the phone owners, suggesting these objects can provide long-term composite lifestyle sketches. "By analyzing the molecules they've left behind on their phones, we could tell if a person is likely female, uses high-end cosmetics, dyes her hair, drinks coffee, prefers beer over wine, likes spicy food, is being treated for depression, wears sunscreen and bug spray—and therefore likely spends a lot of time outdoors—all kinds of things," said first author Amina Bouslimani, PhD, an assistant project scientist in Dorrestein's lab. "This is the kind of information that could help an investigator narrow down the search for an object's owner." There are limitations, Dorrestein said. First of all, these molecular read-outs provide a general profile of person's lifestyle, but they are not meant to be a one-to-one match, like a fingerprint. To develop more precise profiles and for this method to be more useful, he said more molecules are needed in the reference database, particularly for the most common foods people eat, clothing materials, carpets, wall paints and anything else people come into contact with. He'd like to see a trace molecule database on the scale of the fingerprint database, but it's a large-scale effort that no single lab will be able to do alone. Moving forward, Dorrestein and Bouslimani have already begun extending their study with an additional 80 people and samples from other personal objects, such as wallets and keys. They also hope to soon begin gathering another layer of information from each sample—identities of the many bacteria and other microbes that cover our skin and objects. In a 2010 study , their collaborator and co-author, Rob Knight, PhD, professor in the UC San Diego School of Medicine and Jacobs School of Engineering and director of the Center for Microbiome Innovation at UC San Diego, contributed to a study in which his team found they could usually match a computer keyboard to its owner just based on the unique populations of microbes the person left on it. At that time, they could make the match with a fair amount of accuracy, though not yet precisely enough for use in an investigation. Beyond forensics, Dorrestein and Bouslimani imagine trace molecular read-outs could also be used in medical and environmental studies. For example, perhaps one day physicians could assess how well a patient is sticking with a medication regimen by monitoring metabolites on his or her skin. Similarly, patients participating in a clinical trial could be divided into subgroups based on how they metabolize the medication under investigation, as revealed by skin metabolites—then the medication could be given only to those patients who can metabolize it appropriately. Skin molecule read-outs might also provide useful information about a person's exposure to environmental pollutants and chemical hazards, such as in a high-risk workplace or a community living near a potential pollution source.
As Dave Barak said USS Midway museum in San Diego is widely considered to be the best of the best. He didn't really get into why its the best though, so I will. So why is it the best? 2 big glaring reasons the staff and the upkeep: Staff - USS Midway uses more Navy Vets than any other floating museum you will go to. You will find retired Aviators, retired SEAL Officers, retired Chief Engineers and many other Navy guys, even some that served on Midway. Comparatively, USS Intrepid and USS Missouri are very popular. You would be hard pressed to find any Navy Vets at those museums. Last time I went to the Intrepid in 2016, some high school kid was giving the tour. He kept saying soldiers and I kept correcting him. He kept on with the soldier thing, I told my lady friend and we left the tour. Missouri is far better. They have some vets but the vast majority of them were in the Army. Midway is lucky to be in San Diego. San Diego is a Navy town and there are 1000s of Navy Vets in town. Upkeep - USS Midway is in by far the best material condition you will find on a floating museum. Go to the flight deck and you will see this on display in all its glory. Midway looks like it could be on Active Duty. The non-skid is kept perfect and its painted line for line just like it should be. By comparison it makes me sick to walk around on the Intrepid flight deck, its not cared for. The Intrepid is getting 10 times the dollars but the money is going elsewhere obviously. The insides of Midway are also top notch. Most of Intrepid has been cut up into classrooms for kids to mess around in. Most interior spaces are sealed off. Midway is immaculate. The hangar bay is even more impressive than the flight deck. You can go into engineering spaces on guided tours. The bridge and Island are very well kept and entirely accessible. The aircraft collection on Midway is also one of the best. Aside from the SR-71 on Intrepid, her collection pales. Midways presentation of aircraft on the catapults with very nice dummy catapult officers is a very nice touch. USS Midway CV-41 USS Intrepid CV-11 Honorable mention goes to USS Wisconsin in Norfolk. Nauticus is the only US Navy funded museum and has a very nice science and technology museum on the pier. Its very well kept too. Probably the only downfall that rates Wisconsin below Midway is the staff and the lack of cool aircraft to check out. 2nd Honorable mention goes to USS Missouri in Pearl Harbor, located on Battleship Row at Ford Island. The history here is in itself worth it. Missouri is well kept on the inside. Outside its a little hit and miss. The staff are ok, mostly college students with mostly retired Army filling out the Vet ranks. Missouri has the best all around experience though. In addition to the history its floating on, there is also somethings aboard that only Missouri can boast. The Surrender Deck, where Japan signed the formal surrender during WW2 is amazing. On Ford Island, there is a great Aviation museum. You can see the Control Tower and Hangars still will bullet holes from Dec. 7th 1941. The aircraft on hand are immaculate inside the main display hall. The aircraft outside are great but wearing. There is an ongoing effort to restore them but it's slow. Back at Pearl of course you can take a tour boat to see USS Arizona memorial. These boats are run by the US Navy, I used to be in charge of this unit in fact. Its very memorable to see. The adjacent USS Bowfin Museum is outstanding as well. Its in awesome condition. Right next to that is a very nice small USN Submarine Museum. All of these together make Pearly Harbor the best destination overall.
Well first of all, do you and your property deserve a 5 star review? I stayed in an Airbnb in San Diego recently that had a TON of maintenance issues and it just wasn’t cared for. It was a 3 star property at best. The host was nice, but they obviously didn’t care about the quality of their home. They were just trying to crank out rentals. If you always want to receive 5 star reviews, a few things have to happen… You, the host, have to have EXCELLENT communication with your guests. This means you’ve been in contact with them before their stay, checked-in with them after the first night or two, and then ask for any feedback and a review upon departure. Communication is so so so important. Your property MUST be clean. The linens and towels should be in clean and stain-free. The beds should be made neatly and the towels should be folded nicely in the bathroom. Again, this property I stayed at in San Diego had rotting wet towels in the washer when I arrived. It wasn’t acceptable if they wanted a 5 star review. The property has to be well taken care of. This can be tricky because obviously things happen that are out of our control, but the more attention to detail you have about the little things then the less likely you are to receive a 2 or 3 star review. Take care of the little maintenance issues that pop up. Change the burnt out light bulbs, replace the batteries in the TV remotes, make sure the cable and Internet connections work, tighten the loose knobs and handles, and do a quick touch-up paint job on the walls to cover any marks or dings. I arrived to this property is San Diego and half of the light bulbs were burnt out, none of the TV remotes had working batteries in them, and all the hardware on the kitchen cabinets were falling off. The knobs were missing on the washing machine and the walls were badly scuffed up from the garbage can and luggage. Its just annoying and really set the tone for my stay that the place was neglected. Set expectations for your property before they arrive. You can still have a dated or “budget friendly” vacation rental and receive 5 star reviews. Accurately represent your property in the photos and listing description. Most people that are renting a budget property just expect it to be clean and comfortable. They aren’t expecting luxury accommodations. Once you’ve set the expectations for your property in the listing, apply suggestions 1–3. This is just a starting point. There are a lot of other things you can do to achieve consistent 5 star reviews, but I consider these the basics. You don’t always have to go “above and beyond” with gift baskets and extras to make someone’s stay 5-star worthy.