A heavily camouflaged Ford Ranger Raptor has been spotted in Thailand amidst testing.
The all-new Ford Ranger continues its segment high in the third quarter of 2019 with an increase of 12%
(2019 Nissan Serena S-Hybrid Price and Specs | Gallery)When shopping for a family MPV, the biggest deciding
Edaran Tan Chong Motors (TCM) is officially launching the fifth-generation Nissan Serena 2.0 s-hybrid MPV
Previously we reported that Hyundai has an MPV named the Hyundai Custo in the works in China, but our
Sime Darby Auto ConneXion (SDAC) is proud to present the smarter and feature packed new Ford Ranger XLT
families, providing versatility and loads of space.However, the legacy of Toyota’s eponymous MPV
Ford Motor Company and Volkswagen AG signed agreements that expand their global alliance on 10 June 2020
same time, it’s only has front-wheel drive, with an elongated rear half that looks more like an MPV
Sime Darby Auto ConneXion (SDAC) is offering up some awesome ang pao money when you purchase a Ford Ranger
Proton’s foreign strategic partner, Geely unveiled its first MPV in 2019 called the Geely Jiaji
Sime Darby Auto ConneXion (SDAC), the sole distributor for Ford in Malaysia, continues to enhance its
Kia Motors is planning to re-enter the compact MPV market come 2021.
engine Xpander is locally-assembled in Pekan but a common question that consumers have is, is it an MPV
** This article is the personal experience of a 2017 Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT T6FL owner and does not necessarily
compact MPVs, it got us thinking, is there a possibility we will see Hyundai offering up a compact MPV
Yes, believe it or not, the best-selling MPV in the world is an MPV from China named the Wuling Hongguang
Last week, we reported that Ford is working together with Volkswagen to develop the next-generation Ranger
When Ford Performance unleashed the Ford Ranger Raptor, many were disappointed that the pick-up truck
Believe it or not, but Ford really does have a dedicated laboratory for studying and creating artificial
This here is the Geely Jiaji MPV, which made its debut back in March 2019.It is safe to say that the
What do you do if you own a Ford Everest but want yours to stand out from the rest?
(Model | Gallery) The thinking mans Ford Ranger Raptor Same powertrain as the Ford Ranger Raptor, 213
Sime Darby Auto ConneXion (SDAC), the sole distributor for Ford vehicles in Malaysia, announced their
Finally, the 2021 Ford Bronco has been unleashed to the world.
Ford Malaysia has announced that all 19 units of the Ford Ranger Splash have been pre-booked ahead of
May 2020, Sime Darby Auto Connexion (SDAC) is offering massive savings of up to RM 9,000 for their Ford
letter has been used to name crossover models, the “V” letter might just be used to name MPV
** This article is the personal experience of a 2014 Ford Fiesta ST180 owner and does not necessarily
We previously reported the upcoming compact MPV, the Hyundai Custo, in China.
ford mpv-ford mpv-Mazda5 Car Review - The Mazda People Carrier
ford mpv-DTC Ford P0756 Short Explanation
ford mpv-ford mpv-All-New 2021 Ford Tourneo Connect Active: Multi-Activity Lifestyles
ford mpv-New 2021 Ford Explorer Timberline Adds More Off-Road Vibes
ford mpv-The New American Road A Ford Documentary
ford mpv-DTC Ford P2701 Short Explanation
ford mpv-RC4WD Unboxing & RC First Run - RTR 4WD Realistic RC Truck
ford mpv-ford mpv-Removing the factory roof rack from a Ford Escape
ford mpv-DTC Ford P1512 Short Explanation
Getting ready for day 2 at the PHTM EXPO!!! Yesterday was a great day seeing & chatting to our lovely customers! #phtmexpo #taxi #taxishow #cabs #privatehire #ford #vauxhall #mpv #wheelchairaccessibility #voyager https://t.co/AXFHCB8fT8
Ford’s Marazzo-Based MPV To Receive A 2.2-Litre Diesel Engine #Mahindra #MPV #Carnews https://t.co/vp1Q74Ci3V
OUT OF THIS WORLD GALAXY!! 2010 Ford Galaxy 2.0 TDCi Edge in metallic blue. 71k miles, A/C, Remote Central Locking, Electric Windows, Multi Function Steering Wheel. £6,795 #Caerphilly #Ford #Galaxy #MPV #carforsale #cardealer #dealership #cars https://t.co/0AIDLDnshu
We have a new addition to our luxury fleet! Check out our new 8 seater Ford MPV here - #grouptravel #airporttransfer #Leeds #Huddersfield #Bradford https://t.co/s25KMCifAy
JV with Mahindra has prompted Ford to take another look at the MPV segment. Exclusive details here.
@DrTFleming @neilmbriscoe @Shane_O_D @completecar Jesus
Ford Vietnam unveils MPV Tourneo: Ford Tourneo will be sold in the Vietnamese market from… https://t.co/Tm5mrM106I
It's #frontendfriday and we would like to say congratulations to Mr Ferry on the purchase of this stunning Tourneo Custom Sport . #ford #mpv #custom #sport #newcarday @ Trowbridge Ford https://t.co/fFfV3nPBVw
The Team have received reports of vehicles been broken into at Towncourt Crescent and Crossway. A Black Ford MPV People Carrier was seen on one of the occasion's. Did you see anything ? If so please contact the team.Thank You.
We can now confirm there’s plenty to come from the Mahindra-Ford JV, including a new Ford MPV, which will be based on the Mahindra Marazzo. More details here: https://t.co/R3wHG20oSC
Considering the history of Ford in India, it's a bit unfair to say that they have failed in our market. In my opinion, Ford has had a mixed bag in India. ,While on one hand, they've had some really successful product launches (Ikon, Ecosport, first-gen Figo) on the other hand, there has been some commercial failures as well (Fusion, Escort, Mondeo). From these, we can notice that Ford have not been able to deliver successful products on a consistent basis like Maruti Suzuki, Hyundai etc. ,It is seen that successful products from the automaker have been path-breaking in one form or the other, by virtue of which customers come into Ford showrooms., At present, Ford are having struggles of their own in the Indian market. Recently, homegrown automaker Mahindra and Mahindra brought 51 percent stake in the Indian arm of Ford Motor Company. This would mean that future Ford models will likely be sharing their underpinnings with that of Mahindra. ,From this, we know that Ford are willing to take a gamble which may be a bit dangerous. Monthly sales of Ford here at present are around the 3,000 unit mark which is a bit sad considering the value their vehicles offer. Ford have always put their best foot forward here and it is evident in their cars today. ,Their cars offer good performance at a decent price tag. Consider the Aspire, which is the only such car in its segment preferred by enthusiasts. Same goes for the Ecosport, which was the car that invented the popular compact SUV segment here. ,Their cars offer good mileage, but largely get ignored due to their brand image in India. Ford also conducts programmes like she drives and Ford cartesy. She drives encourages women to get behind the wheel and experience Ford vehicles. It also involves a few driving tasks which may be useful in everyday driving. Ford Cartesy is a global program from the automaker by which they allow the contestants to test drive and make of the Ford models. In return, they also ask feedback from them and look further into improving their vehicles. Other than that, Ford also provide spare parts at a reasonable price. Servicing is on par with Maruti Suzuki and Hyundai and customers buying a Ford should be benefitting from this. Considering that Ford cars had prices of spare parts on the higher price range during its earlier days, it is a respectable recovery from the automaker. I'd like to wholeheartedly recommend pepole to try a Ford whenever they're looking for a budget vehicle. Despite all these, Ford products are not on the radar of potential buyers due to a variety of reasons which are, India is a market where most buyers buy their vehicles based on the mileage it gives. That's where Ford falls down the pecking order. ,Ford cars, despite not being rated as fuel efficient by some, offer decent mileage figures. ,But these figures are a bit inferior compared to the best in the business. Safety in their cars is one aspect that is not yet taken seriously. Ford cars have improved in safety over the years and have performed well in recent crash tests. ,The Figo and Aspire got 3 and 4 stars in the global ncap crash tests conducted a couple of years ago. ,Despite this, their cars are largely ignored. Indians also want value for money while buying a car. ,This also means features like a touchscreen infotainment system and sunroof are compulsory on the minds of most car buyers., Ford were a little bit late to react to this and this may have led to them being not active in the sales department. Performance is one aspect where Ford is having an edge over most of its competitors. ,Their cars offer performance at a reasonable price which I think most manufacturers here don't. ,Sadly, India has less performance enthusiastic buyers and more economy warriors. Ford also do not advertise their products much on television or print, which is a bit sad. ,Even so when they update their cars, we rarely hear of this in the newspaper or television. ,On the other hand, competitors do the exact opposite. Reliability is one thing that worries the customers here. ,Indians look at Japanese and Korean cars as reliable and they are among the most respected brands here. ,American brands are considered less reliable here due to their tendency to break down faster than their counterparts. Lastly, it may be due to their previous image. This can also be counted as a continuation for the previous point. ,Ikon’s and Figo’s have suffered a few reliablity issues in the past and service costs were not as low as they are today., Majority of Indians don't believe that Ford service costs are affordable. Just ask a potential car buyer about buying a Ford and he will mostly tell you that he heard that they are expensive to maintain. I think these are a few factors which do not work in the automaker's favour here. As per reports, Ford are planning to bring a few desirable products here which include a mid-size SUV and an MPV. Both the segments, especially the former, are seeing good demand and more automakers are set to enter here in the near future. Hope that Ford gets it right there and gets their Indian operations back on track,. Thank you.
Wonderful question. I have had a number of Mazda vehicles including a 626, MPV, Protégé, and RX-8 so I know exactly what you are talking about. Here are a few thoughts as to why they haven’t been more successful. Mazda has always been one of the smallest Japanese manufactures. They have always lacked the marketing muscle and budget to properly promote their products. Mazda can’t sell based on reliability alone since Toyota has that market cornered. Instead they focus on fun to drive. Unfortunately, the market believes that fun to drive cars only come from Europe, so their target market naturally gravitates to European brands if they can afford them. As great as the RX-7 was, it was the poor man’s Porsche 924/944. And it was never the better choice and therefore never was aspirational. So this leaves for Mazda the smaller segment of the market that wants fun to drive cars but can’t afford the Europeans. Mazda has for a long time bet on the rotary engine. That engine, as great as it is for handling due to light weight, never made more power than the European competition and got worse fuel economy. To make things worse, the rotary was considerably more fragile and temperamental than piston engines. This definitely impacted their reputation as a reliable brand. Worse, this happened at the same time when Toyota and Honda cemented their reputations for reliability. Mazda’s product planners sometimes anticipate trends way ahead of the others. Sadly, that also means they are out of step with the industry and give up just when the trend gains momentum. The Mazda RX-8 was unveiled as a 4-door sports car in 2003. The Porsche Panamera followed in 2009. Mazda discontinued RX-8 in 2011. Mazda foresaw the need for a family 3 row SUV with the 1997 Mazda MPV All-Sport. Toyota released the Highlander in 2001 and Honda released the Pilot in 2002. Ironically, Mazda’s 2000 MPV moved to a small front wheel drive van complete with sliding doors just as rest the rest of the market was moving to family haulers with car like swing out doors and people traded in minivans for SUVs. Mazda’s control by Ford limited them from making truly disruptive moves. Although the Mazda 3, Ford Focus and Volvo S40 were all developed by Mazda and used Mazda based engines, Mazda wasn’t allowed to use turbo version of their own engine or make their interiors very high quality lest it compete with Volvo. Now ouside of Ford control, they are making their cars more premium. Even today, Mazda has no electric or hybrid cars. They have hit the sweet spot in small SUVs with CX-5 and in small cars with the Mazda 3. Unfortunately small sedans don’t sell well and aren’t very profitable. Given their meager resources, they can only do a few things well. Hopefully they choose wisely and hit the ball out of the park on one or two vehicles that people really desire and have high margins to keep the company going and fund future development.
These are my personal picks. Petrol, options for 1, ,SUV, (Compact) FORD Ecosport HYUNDAI Venue (1.0 Turbo Petrol) 2, ,Sedan HONDA, ,City SKODA Rapid HYUNDAI Verna 3, ,Hatchback Polo, GT TSI HYUNDAI i20 2020 4, ,MPV Maruti Suzuki Ertiga Petrol engine are good if your monthly travel is less than 1000 km. Diesel, Options for 1, ,SUV Ford Ecosport Mahindra XUV300 2,. ,Sedan HYUNDAI Verna CRDi 3, ,Hatchback FORD, Figo HYUNDAI ,i20 4, ,MPV MAHINDRA ,Marazzo Avoid these at any cost Tata Nexon Petrol (too much of turbo lag) and drivability is not so great. Honda City Diesel (unrefined Engine). W-RV Diesel (unrefined Engine). Toyota Yaris (too expensive for what it has to offer). Hope it Helped.
On the case of the Multipla, it was function-over-form. I'm no fan of the design, but as an engineer, I can appreciate functionality. The Multipla is quite a wide car, with a lot of space inside, and with the mutant-looking styling, it's aso quite tall. Yet it's a short car, making city parking easier. Everything is designed with interior space in mind - the manual shift versions has the gearshift in the dash like a transit van; there is no driveshaft tunnel so the floor was flat, which allows for three seats in the front, for a total of 6-seats. By all accounts, it had an excellent interior and decent handling. It won ,Top Gear Car of the Year, 1999. And ,Top Gear Family Car of the Year, for four consecutive years 2001-2004. So it goes to show that for a lot of people, cars are functional machines, and that overrides any consideration for styling. It's a low-cost family car with a design that doesn't compromise on internal space. That's what some people want. As for drag coefficient, this is an MPV/people carrier, you're not really expecting any kind of fuel economy to begin with. Nevertheless, this car has a Cd of 0.32-0.34, which was typical for that era, and low compared with other MPVs of that era. So it's not reasonable to suggestion that it could (or should) be designed with better drag performance easily and without compromise. This is especially the case when you consider that the 1999 Ford Mustang, a car that you'd expect the makers would have considerable more leeway in enhancing aerodynamics, has a Cd of 0.36. Yes, the Multipla is more aerodynamic than the Mustang. But both groups of owners don't care about aerodynamics for the same reasons.
The U.S. Department of Energy has published a list of fuel consumption figures for 2011 Model Year vehicles. The list can be found here - http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/FEG2011.pdf 2-seaters: , Honda CRZ - ,37 Minicompact: , MINI Cooper - ,32 Subcompact: , Ford Fiesta SFE - ,33, Toyota Yaris - ,32 Compact & small wagon, Honda Civic Hybrid - ,41, Honda Insight - ,41, VW Golf diesel - ,34, VW Jetta diesel - ,34, Audi A3 diesel - ,34, VW Jetta SportWagen diesel - ,34 Midsize, Toyota Prius - ,50, Nissan Versa - ,29 Large, Hyundai Sonata - ,28, Honda Accord - ,27 For the U.K., MSN has published a list of most economical cars in each class. Full article here - http://cars.uk.msn.com/features/green-motoring/articles.aspx?cp-documentid=147863614 City,: Smart ForTwo - ,83.1, ,Supermini,: Ford Fiesta Econetic - ,76.3, ,Family hatch,: Honda Insight SE - ,64, ,Large family,: Toyota Prius - ,72.4, ,Junior executive,: BMW 320d EfficientDynamics Edition - ,68.9, ,Executive,: BMW 520d - ,56.5, ,Luxury,: Audi A8 - ,42.8, ,Coupe/Cabriolet,: Vauxhall Tigra 1.3 CDTi - ,61.4, ,MPV,: Ford C-Max 1.6 TDCi - ,60.1, ,4x4,: Lexus RX450h - ,44.1
We don’t get all the same cars as Europe because buyers want different things. Surely Ford does not sell more F-150s in Europe than Fiestas. They sure do here. Transits are selling very well, in all sizes.
What makes a 1.5L I4 engine from a typical MPV more powerful than the 2.5 L I4 from 1915 Ford Model T? The difference between a 1915 Model T engine power and a modern one hinges around the engine speed, compression ratio, materials/tolerances used and fuel control. The Model T had a compression ration of just 3.98:1, allowing it to run on variety of fuels available at the time such as kerosene and ethanol in addition to petrol. This low compression greatly reduced the amount of air/fuel mix that could be admitted into the combustion chambers, restricting the power to 20 hp from a displacement of 2.9 lt at a speed of 1500 rpm. The engine was capable of up to 1800 rpm, but the volumetric efficiency dropped off such that it could not rev any higher than that. This was a good aspect, since the three bearing main crankshaft would not be able to support high revs, but it did limit the power delivered since power is a function of torque multiplied by engine speed. The engine delivered an economy of around 13 - 21 mpg, which seems very low mileage today, but with a side valve, flat head combustion chamber design, it had a huge surface area and lost most of its heat energy to the cooling system rather than be used to drive the pistons down. The engine was quite advanced for the time, with the engine block being a single casting unlike its contemporaries, and this led to ease of manufacture that was rapidly adopted by the industry. Despite its forward thinking design, it was still limited by the materials and accuracy of the machine processes used 100 years ago. Now if you look at a modern design, the differences are quite apparent. A typical 1.5 lt 4 cylinder will easily rev to over 6,000 rpm allowing the torque developed by a combustion chamber running at something like 11:1 compression ration to be greatly multiplied. Instead of a single mechanical side draft carburettor mixing low octane fuels of various grades it will employ a high precision computer controlled injector for each cylinder, and this delivers a precise amount of high octane fuel at exactly the right ratio as calculated by the engine ECU using a MAF (mass air flow) sensor in the intake manifold. 4 valve heads, which are designed to minimise energy sapping surface area and maximise air flow allow high compression ratios, and the highly regulated fuel quality makes this all possible. Try running your modern engine on kerosene and see how far you get. In short, the change in conditions (driven by the feedback from improved design and use) have paved the way for such design and manufacturing advances that we take for granted these days. It did take 100 years to get to this point, and it will be very interesting to see what transport looks like in another 100 years time.