nissan navara wrap

If we talk about safety and exterior design, which car is the best, Tata Nexon, Hyundai Venue, XUV 300 or Maruti Brezza?

I am not an Indian, but I rather could say that ,Hyundai,’s ‘not for Europe’/’not for Britain’ ,Venue, ,small crossover, is better than the aforementioned models. As neither of the two, mainly ,Tata Motors, and ,Suzuki,, are active in the US and Canadian markets, see: ,https://www.canadianbusiness.com/companies-and-industries/north-american-suzuki-cars-1980-2013,. Whereas Tata and ,Mahindra & Mahindra, are deeply non-existent in certain parts of Europe, specifically in the ,Nordic countries,. Probably, due to the impact of safety and parts-related emission laws imposed by the European Union and governments of non-EU members, like Norway and Iceland, which could also mean that Tata and Mahindra are neither selling each of their cars in those aforementioned countries with deeply cold climates than India. So, that could consider Tata, Mahindra, and Suzuki’s car manufacturing unit as infamous in those said markets apart from India. Whereas, the whole ,Hyundai Motor Group,, is deeply famous since they recorded their milestone of bringing their now-deceased [Mk1] ,Hyundai Pony (aka Excel), supermini into being voted as ‘Best product number 10’ by the US-based and centred ‘Fortune’ business magazine circa 1980s. Hence, that factor of considering the non-European/non-British Hyundai Venue small crossover as a better car than Suzuki’s Vitara and vice versa manifests the point that Hyundai is also synonymous as a ,construction company, from its early to present life, which could be later evolved as a company of shopping centres, electronics and appliances, heavy equipment, and marine/aquatic interests as well. Making the non-European Venue small crossover and other models from the said Hyundai Motor Group safer, affordable, durable, reliable, spacious, and even fun to drive. Whereas Maruti, which handles the operation of Suzuki in India, started its life as an invention of the [Indian] government’s ambitions, which examines the reputation of Suzuki cars in India and overseas as unsafe compared to the conglomerate where Hyundai/Kia is found inside. As it was one of the reasons why numerous people could start loathing Suzuki and even Toyota for their sake of being incompentent in not just India, but also in Europe as well, in addition to Suzuki’s car manufacturing unit being already dead for real in the USA and Canada, but not in ,Mexico, for example. Which is why for Toyota, they could just ,sell off Subaru and Mazda to Europe’s Peugeot,, thus replace the two of them with Tata for their (Toyota’s) sake of safeguarding their role in India, unless if Tata could also sell ,Jaguar Land Rover, to ,Daimler AG,, which owns ,Mercedes-Benz,. Therefore, as when I said that Hyundai/Kia does better in safety and affordability than the aforementioned marques, then it could be useful for the ,Hyundai Motor Group, to purchase thus give ,Nissan and Mitsubishi Motors, access to the parts bin and platforms ,Hyundai,/,Kia, currently uses for their cars like the i20/Rio supermini. And if Hyundai already took over ,Nissan, and ,Mitsubishi Motors, from ,Renault,, therefore, ,Renault too could acquire thus deepen ties with the said owner of Mercedes-Benz,, ,Daimler AG,. Now, I am going the wrap this hard to make answer of mine with an image to understand. - ,Genda Nicolai Yturzaeta Iwakawa/awakawI ateazrutY ialociN adneG ‘Now, you want to start thinking of Hyundai/Kia buying then giving Nissan and Mitsubishi Motors access to their parts bin and platforms?’ See also, for you to leave answer with more words: If Hyundai already took over Nissan and Mitsubishi from Renault, then why couldn't the i20/Rio developer rename the Micra and Mirage (aka Space Star) builders' names back? With 'Datsun' for Nissan and 'Colt' for Mitsubishi, as they're both catchier. Dear European/Nordic, British/Irish, Australian/NZ, Indian, and South African petrolheads: If Hyundai buys then gives Nissan and Mitsubishi access to the parts bin they're using for the i20. Then, could Renault purchase thus deepen ties with Daimler? Dear petrolheads, especially from Britain, India, Australia, and NZ: If Hyundai's technology was derived from Mitsubishi Motors, then why couldn't the i20/Rio builder take over Nissan and the Mirage maker? Thus remake their cars as Japanese Hyundais. Dear European, British/Irish, Australian/NZ, Indian, and South African petrolheads: If Isuzu's D-Max pickup/ute/bakkie is better than Nissan's Navara and Mitsubishi's L200/Triton, why don't Hyundai take over Nissan/Mitsubishi while Nissan buys Isuzu? Dear European, British/Irish, Australian/NZ, and Indian petrolheads: If the Hyundai Venue/Kia Seltos/Hyundai Creta/Kia Sonet and Nissan Magnite are absent in Europe and the UK/Ireland, then why don't Hyundai take over Nissan/Mitsubishi from Renault? Dear Indians: If Hyundai (which also includes Kia Motors) took over Nissan and Mitsubishi from Renault. Therefore, could the Micra manufacturer end up using the i20/Rio developer's architecture as with Nissan already planned to release the 'Magnite'? Dear European, British/Irish, Australian/NZ, Indian, Southeast Asian, and South African petrolheads: If Hyundai with Kia is bigger than Nissan with Mitsubishi, then why don't the i20 builder purchase thus turn Nissan into a Japanese Hyundai offshoot?