Tag

pbgc premium rate Related Articles

Toll rate hike deferment: Gov to pay operators RM 2 bil in compensation

Halim Mu’adzam Shah Bridge (JSAHMS) Seremban-Port Dickson HighwayAlso read: Gov postpones toll rate

Naza offering low interest rate from 1.88% until 15-July for recond cars

Customers are entitled to a low-interest rate from 1.88 percent and a 1-year warranty during this promotional

Why I Buy: Best bang for money for car features! My x70 Premium X even come with Sunroof.

owner and does not necessarily reflect the views of WapCar.Detail about car Car info: 2020 Proton x70 Premium

Things that surprised us in the 2020 Isuzu D-Max 1.9 Premium

I must admit, that was exactly what I did to the Isuzu D-Max 1.9 Premium when it turned up for a scrap

Ride high this Chinese New Year with Mitsubishi

ASX.For selected variants of the Triton, customers are entitled to either cash rebates or interest rate

Ratings: 2019 Proton Iriz 1.6L Premium CVT - Commendable score in ride comfort, 160/250 overall

Proton Iriz 1.6L Premium.Driving Performance - 31.5/50 pts, great handling 2019 Proton Iriz 1.6L Premium

Toyota Harrier, premium Toyota without the Lexus badge

Toyota Harrier is a well-known name amongst Malaysians, as the model has long established itself as a premium

Review: 2020 Proton Saga 1.3L Premium facelift, true definition of value for money

ndash; and we know how price-sensitive shoppers of this segment are.We think that the Proton Saga 1.3L Premium

Mercedes-Benz Malaysia led the premium segment in 2019

cars sold and a 1.8 percent market share in 2019, Mercedes-Benz Malaysia (MBM) retains its lead in the premium

2020 Lexus LM 300h launched in Thailand, pricier than S-Class, available with either 4 or 7 seats

The 4-seater costs a cool 6.5 million baht (RM 874,556 in the current exchange rate) while 7 seater is

View More

Indonesia to be first in ASEAN to launch all-electric Lexus UX 300e

the company’s electrified vehicle strategy in Indonesia.As EVs in Indonesia are still viewed as premium

Geely's premium EV, the Zeekr 001 debuts in China, around RM177k

the Zeekr 001.Zeekr is the new pure electric brand from Geely Holding Group, and plans to take on the premium

Proton dealers have temporarily suspended order taking for Proton X70 Premium X

If you are looking to buy a Proton X70 and have your sights set on the highest specifications Premium

Gov postpones toll rate hike plans to 2022 for 3 highways

Proton X70 CKD: New Premium X 2WD variant to come?

Automotive Association (MAA) production data, it appears that Proton will be introducing a new X70 Premium

Ratings: 2019 Proton Persona 1.6L Premium - Excellent score in purchase and cost

In this weeks Ratings article, we’re taking an in-depth look at the 2019 Proton Persona 1.6L Premium

Geely's new EV-only premium sub-brand Zeekr aims at Tesla

In an effort to take on Tesla, Geely has announced its plans to launch a new premium EV brand, &ldquo

Owner Review: Finding my new daily driver - Proton Saga Premium 2019

** This article is the personal experience of a 2019 Proton Saga Premium owner and does not necessarily

Leaked 2021 Nissan X-Trail official photos reveals a more premium interior

along with panoramic sun roof which we think is the higher-end variant, like the one on Proton X70 Premium

Owner Review: Met Some Problems with My 2020 Proton X70 Premium X. Do I Regret Buying It?

** This article is the personal experience of a 2020 Proton X70 Premium X owner and does not necessarily

Pros and Cons: 2021 Isuzu D-Max - Very premium, but still not perfect

mull over, well take you through the pros and cons of the D-Max.Pros Low road tax, reliable drivetrain Premium

Is your monthly income enough to own the 2021 Toyota Corolla Cross?

service (amount, tenure, and interest).To keep things simple, we’re going for a 2.27% p.a. interest rate

Want to buy a 2021 Isuzu D-Max? Here’s the minimum salary required

For the purpose of this article, we will be focusing on Premium variants of the all-new D-Max, including

GrabCar Premium vehicles in Malaysia to get Nanoe air purifier

Soon GrabCar Premium rides will offer premium riders with cleaner air thanks to Grab Holdings Inc&rsquo

Why You Should Go For The 2019 Proton Saga Premium Instead Of The Standard Variant

company has trimmed the model line up from four to three variants – Standard MT, Standard AT and Premium

Ratings: 2020 Proton X70 Premium X (CKD) - The best family SUV in Malaysia?

and Nissan X-Trail.Lets run it through our WapCar Rating System to break things down.2020 Proton X70 Premium

New 2020 Perodua Bezza facelift 1.3 Premium X is our pick of the range, RM 43,980

X (MT) citing low uptake rate from the public.The Bezza facelift is a stunner in the metal and its extensive

Pros and Cons: Mazda 3 – Premium inside out but are you willing to pay for it?

shortlisted the Mazda 3, here are its pros and cons to help with your buying decision.Pros Seductive looks Premium

At RM 66k, the Proton Exora is the cheapest MPV to feature ESC

(ESC), which helps mitigate skidding and the cheapest MPV to have this feature is the Proton Exora Premium

Illegal “premium” to cut queue for Proton X70 in Pakistan, sold out in 4 days

X70 since its launch just a few days ago.The problem arises since some dealers have charged a “premium

pbgc premium rate Related Images

pbgc premium rate Related Car Videos

  • Pbgc Premium Rate -An Overview Of The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC).

  • Pbgc Premium Rate -PBGC Director Says Increased Bankruptcies Could Lead To Higher Pension Premiums

  • How To Make Money With International Premium Rate Numbers

  • AT&T Retiree Benefit Reductions For 2022

  • How Much Of Your Pension Is Guaranteed By The PBGC?

  • Pbgc Premium Rate -Hidden Debts: US Governments's Pension Guarantees

  • What Happens To Your Pension If The Company Goes Bankrupt?

  • Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. V. LTV Corp. Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained

  • What’s An Insurance Premium?

  • Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation

pbgc premium rate Post Review

PBGC to Allow Greater Flexibility for Variable-Rate Premium Filings https://t.co/A08ECkQ0fZ https://t.co/58ATPEFx0Q

$5 increase in the #PBGC variable-rate premium for #pension plans for 2017: https://t.co/MYev91XWU0 https://t.co/K0tDFJ9Xwz

$1 increase in 2017 #PBGC flat-rate, per-participant #multiemployer plan premium: https://t.co/h6HfYPD1BI https://t.co/yBjgwVDoc0

PBGC pushes back flat rate premium due date - BenefitsPro: PBGC pushes back flat rate premium due dateBenefits... http://t.co/qEwikIjCrw

Are you choosing the right PBGC variable rate premium (VRP) method? Director, Dan Atkinson, warns that savings today may mean increased costs tomorrow. #finance #interestrates #retirement #definedbenefit #actuaries #pensions https://t.co/iOX1QxHAQ7

The PBGC Changes Flat-Rate Premium Due Date for Large Plans http://t.co/q93nxOVmlc #HumanResources

Plan sponsors should review contribution & investment policies if PBGC variable-rate premium increases are a concern. http://t.co/VMKDMlEKuf

PBGC moves flat-rate premium due date for large plans to same date that variable-rate premium is due: http://t.co/0NIAQHEaXX

PBGC issues updated variable-rate premium information for December 2016: https://t.co/aCEPKQdwxE

Payment of Premiums; Large-Plan Flat-Rate Premium: Based on its regulatory review under Executive Order 13563 ... http://t.co/GQfN1UFoR8

pbgc premium rate Q&A Review

What happens to private defined benefit pensions in bankrupcy?

In the U.S., despite a growing market for pension liability insurance contracts, most DB pension plans have not been immunized with insurance contracts and remain (mostly off-balance sheet) liabilities of the plan sponsor. Pensioners are not (completely) at risk, however. After the 1963 failure of the Studebaker pension plan, it just took 11 years until ERISA (the 1974 act that regulates most employee retirement benefits), insured private (and multi-employer) pensions under the auspices of the ,Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp, ,(PBGC). When the plan sponsor goes bankrupt or otherwise terminates its pension arrangements and transfers them to the PBGC. When this occurs, the PBGC gets the assets, the liabilities, and the administration of the pension. Pensions so transferred are subject to ,Maximum Monthly Annuity Guarantees, Pension Benefits, which means most executive pensions are not guaranteed by the PBGC. Plan sponsors also pay insurance premiums to the PBGC, since in many cases assets transferred will not meet all the liabilities. To reduce the moral hazard, under ERISA ,plan sponsors are required to maintain a certain level of assets to support their pension liabilities, with minimum required contributions in the case of deficits, in order to bring the plan into surplus or fully funded status over time. The interest rates used to calculate the plan liabilities, the projected returns on plan assets used to assess the gap, and the length of time companies have to amortize their funding deficits have all been criticized as being insufficient to protect the PBGC or the long-term viability of the plans. Similarly, the PBGC's own assets may be insufficient to cover claims in the case of systematic transfer of pension liabilities.

If a company goes bankrupt do you lose your retirement benefits (401k, etc…)?

A 401k is an individual account structured in some ways like a trust. The money in that account is not an asset on the balance sheet of the employer nor can it be accessed by the employer under any circumstance. (Private 457s are different) Employer matching funds can be forfeited if an employee leaves the company before the vesting period (3 or 2–6 years) but even then the matching funds can only be used to offset the cost of plan administration. A minor caveat here is that sometimes employers offer their individual company stock as an option in the plan or provide matching funds in the form of stock. This is generally something that should not be allowed to get above 10% of the 401k balance for each individual. While the company still cannot directly take the stock back if the company goes under the hit to the individual’s retirement will be significant. Diversify out of company stock as soon as possible in your 401k down to a max of 10% preferably 5%. A pension can be “lost” in a sense but this is only a serious issue for higher earning employees. Every private pension plan has to pay insurance premiums to the pension benefit guarantee corporation which is a public/private hybrid firm that insures company and union pension plans. If a private pension fails for any reason it is taken over by the PBGC and pensions continue to be paid out albeit at a reduced rate. For most middle and upper middle class employees this will be a bit of a haircut but won’t be too bad. Any high earning employees without alternative savings and investments will be in trouble though as there is a cap on payouts. Of course the PBGC is woefully underfunded so take this “insurance” with a grain of salt and don’t rely on a private pension EVER.

How can I retrieve my Instagram account if someone changed my username, phone number and password?

Many people have been asking this thesame ask and yet no one has fixed idea proper answer for this. Today I am going to say you the most easy fix for this. You can easily solve this burden by using ,this tools that works., Here is the link for you: ,Online Social Solutions, I have seen a lot of people having this similar problem. Many of them have asked this ask a lot. You might think that this pain is in point of fact hard to be tackled but it is not. allow me tell you that the solution is completely much simple. Just follow the steps I am presenting to you and this will be solved in a business of minutes. This is a categorically common ask that is asked every beyond the places these days. People are a pain to acquire the answer for this difficulty but many fails. I found the solution upon a site higher than the search in the search engine and I am going to allocation it afterward you today. Just Follow These Steps: 1. Go to the tool that is available from the link above. It is an online tool so there is nothing to download. It works from anywhere and from any device. 2. It is will ask you for either username or phone number. Just enter the correct information. 3. Wait for the application to finish it work. 4. This the most easiest way that I found to be working with efficient. 5. Application is updated on daily basis. 6. Totally anonymous. Your identity is totally anonymous as this is server based applicataion. There is nothing to worry about. The golden years for most Americans appear increasingly threatened by the global financial crisis. Retirement accounts have lost from $2 trillion to $4 trillion as stocks have tumbled nearly 50% from their peak in 2007. For Americans facing retirement, the details of how these plans work may be fuzzy, but the big picture is clear: Whatever comfortable cushion they may have had is now gone, and the process of building it back up will be arduous and long — perhaps too long for employees who are nearing retirement age. The pain isn’t limited to individuals with plummeting 401(k)s. Sponsors of private and public pensions — which typically invest between 60% and 70% in equities — are also finding their accounts billions of dollars below minimum requirements. The financial crisis “is affecting all types of retirement plans very similarly because they’re all invested in the same assets — stocks and bonds,” says Peter J. Brady, senior economist at the Investment Company Institute (ICI), a Washington, D.C.-based association of investment companies and mutual funds. “People have a lot less in their accounts than they had a short period ago.” The ripple effect of shrinking retirement accounts and under-funded pensions threatens to undermine the broader economy as older Americans delay retirement, local governments raise taxes, and companies challenged with withering pension balances lay off workers in response to the shortfall. Wharton professor Olivia Mitchell discusses evaluating Retirement Risk Management The crisis has many retirement experts calling for change — some for tweaks to the existing system, others for full-blown retirement reform. To supplement Social Security, American workers have a choice of two types of employer-sponsored retirement plans: defined benefit plans, in which an employer promises to take care of employees when they retire; and defined contribution plans, in which employers help employees accumulate their own retirement funds. Since Congress amended the tax code in 1978 to accommodate defined contribution plans, the bulk of private employers have shifted to them, with plans such as the 401(k), and away from traditional pensions. Most public employees, however, are still covered by traditional pensions. “Thirty years ago, half the workforce had a pension plan, and it was a [defined benefit] plan,” notes Olivia S. Mitchell, executive director of the Pension Research Council and a professor of insurance and risk management at Wharton. Today, about half of the American workforce is covered by an employer-sponsored retirement plan, but the majority of them are defined contribution plans, Mitchell says. About 22 million workers are covered by defined benefit plans today, while about 66 million are covered by defined contribution plans, according to the Employee Benefit Research Institute (EBRI), a nonprofit research organization in Washington, D.C. Trouble All Around Both groups have been hit hard by the crisis, but in different ways. Employers offering defined benefit plans — commonly known as traditional pension plans — must set aside money over time in order to pay employees a promised amount upon retirement. This “defined benefit” is often based on a formula using the number of years worked and level of salary earned. Employees covered by a defined benefit plan may not feel terribly worried about the current economic crisis, because their retirement benefits are supposedly guaranteed. But employers behind those pensions are now struggling to fund the long-term promises they have made. Employers offering defined contribution plans — which include 401(k)s, 403(b)s, 457s, and a few others — shift the responsibility of accumulating retirement income from the employer to the employee. Employers pay administrative costs and often offer to match employee contributions, but no law or regulation forces them to do so. Worker participation in most defined contribution plans is voluntary, and many workers choose not to save any money at all. Employees who have been trying to build a nest egg have seen account balances drop precipitously in the current financial crisis, a situation made worse in some cases by employers opting to scale back or eliminate their 401(k) contributions. So far, there has been no definitive response to the financial crisis from the millions of workers enrolled in defined contribution plans, says Wharton’s Mitchell. “We find some people have pulled entirely out of the stock market, some have gone into lifestyle funds, and some think this is a buying opportunity.” Still, the crisis brought into focus one of the drawbacks of the do-it-yourself defined contribution plans: Many participants did not adequately diversify their investments, leaving themselves more vulnerable than they should be to market risk. “Even before the financial crisis, we have been concerned about the ability of 401(k) plans to provide secure retirement income,” Alicia H. Munnell, director of the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College, testified to Congress in February. “Workers continue to have almost complete discretion over whether to participate, how much to contribute, how to invest, and how and when to withdraw the funds. Evidence indicates that people make mistakes at every step along the way. They don’t join the plan, they don’t contribute enough, they don’t diversify their holdings, they over invest in company stock, they take out money when they switch jobs and they don’t annuitize at retirement.” Although most financial planners recommend that investors shift retirement assets away from equities and into fixed-income investments as they age, many 401(k) investors approaching retirement were still heavily invested in stocks before the market downturn. Nearly one in four workers between the ages of 56 and 65 had more than 90% of their account balances in equities at the end of 2007, EBRI found, and more than two out of five held more than 70% in equities. (In contrast, the average target-date fund — which automatically reallocates investments as a person gets closer to retirement — would have allocated just 51.2% to equities for investors aged 56 to 65 at the end of 2007, according to EBRI.) In January, Boston-based Fidelity, the nation’s largest 401(k) provider, surveyed its 17,095 corporate 401(k) plans and found the average workplace savings account balance had dropped 27% between 2007 and 2008 — from $69,200 to $50,200. Many older workers have been left with little choice but to keep working to make up the sudden shortfall. That’s bad news not only for workers, but also for companies trying to stay competitive. “If all of your older workers are feeling the pinch, they might not retire. So there is an HR aspect,” says Mitchell. “Baby boomers think they’re never going to retire [and many] are quite morose…. There are those who are saying the defined contribution approach has failed, and are calling for permanent restructuring.” It could take two to five years (assuming a 5% equity rate of return) for 401(k) balances to return to January 1, 2008, levels, according to EBRI estimates. If the equity return rate drops to zero for the next few years, recovery could take anywhere from two-and-a-half to nine years, EBRI says. “What we know from past economic cycles is that if the economy turns around, then much of this will reverse,” says EBRI CEO Dallas Salisbury. “But we don’t know when it’s going to turn around.” Cutting Contributions KNOWLEDGE@WHARTON HIGH SCHOOL Making it even harder for defined contribution plan participants to recoup, a number of employers are scaling back or eliminating matching contributions in the face of a slowing economy. In March, a survey of employers by WorldatWork, an association of human resource managers, and the American Benefits Council, representing companies that provide benefits to their employees, found that 3% of the 505 responding companies had eliminated their 401(k) match, and 8% had either decreased the match or were considering a decrease. The Pension Rights Center, a Washington, D.C.-based consumer organization focused on retirement security, lists on its web site more than 150 companies that have either changed or suspended 401(k) matches. The fact that companies can scale back on their match during tough economic times could be positive, some argue. “Unlike a freeze in a pension plan, a freeze in a [defined contribution] plan is not usually permanent,” says Jan Jacobson, senior counsel for retirement policy at the American Benefits Council. “To the extent that a company is choosing between laying off workers or stopping their match for a while, some companies will choose to stop the match. And I think I’d rather work for the company that stops the match.” Brady, of the ICI, notes that “this flexibility is actually a strength of the 401(k). It might be a way [for companies to save money] that doesn’t have a short-term cost to employees. And I assume they’ll resume contributions when the economy recovers…. I’m sure people would rather lose their 401(k) match than lose their job.” Participants in defined benefit plans at private companies face a different set of problems. Companies that offer pension plans are being squeezed by a sudden decline in assets, an increase in liabilities and changes in the law that force them to make up the shortfall faster than in the past. “Many companies might have to lay workers off, walk away from their pensions, shut down a plant,” says Alan Glickstein, senior consultant at the Washington, D.C.-based human resources and financial management consultancy, Watson Wyatt. “Companies [have] to make very difficult decisions.” The nation’s top 100 pension plan sponsors saw their pension funds drop by $303 billion in 2008, going from an $86 billion surplus — relative to the minimum amount required by pension regulations — at the end of 2007 to a $217 billion deficit at the end of 2008, an analysis by Watson Wyatt found in March. Aggregate funding decreased by 30 percentage points, from 109% funded — meaning they held 9% more than the minimum-required funding — at the end of 2007 to 79% funded at the end of 2008. A different survey by Mercer, a New York-based human resources consulting company, found that aggregate funding of pension plans of S&P 1500 companies fell to 74% at the end of February, with an aggregate deficit of $373 billion. Year-end figures, which are what plan sponsors generally use to calculate pension expenses and contribution requirements for the coming year, showed an aggregate deficit of $409 billion at the end of December, with funding at 75%. The shortfall stems not only from a decline in equity values, but also from falling interest rates, which have forced companies to increase the amount they set aside for future benefit payments. As a result, money that could have been spent on growing the business is being funneled into pension obligations. Mercer estimates that pension expenses for S&P 1500 companies will jump to $70 billion in 2009, compared to $10 billion in 2008 and $35 billion in 2007. “Companies need to put these assets and liabilities on their financial statements,” says Adrian Hartshorn, a principal in Mercer’s financial strategy group. “It affects their balance sheets and it affects the profits they report, and clearly it also affects the amount of cash they have to put into the plan.” Changes under the Pension Protection Act (PPA) of 2006, many of which took effect in 2008, are also making it more difficult for companies to ride out the storm. Actuaries calculate annual shortfalls in pension funds using a method called “smoothing,” which averages investment gains and losses over several years. “Under the old law, we had the ability to spread ups and downs over a four- to five-year period,” says Glickstein. “So we could sort of calm the ups and downs to make sure it’s not just noise in the market.” The new law limits smoothing to just 24 months, meaning the dramatic losses of 2008 will have a proportionately larger impact on the calculated shortfalls. In essence, the new accounting rules are forcing companies to act now to make up for a huge financial gap, even though a quick turn-around in the economy could ultimately negate the deficit. “The challenge is, what is the real number?” asks Glickstein. “What is the right posture [for companies] to take in the face of a temporary phenomenon that has created a huge amount of pressure?” The pressure has spurred some companies to reconsider their pension offerings. “Continuing to operate a [defined benefit] plan is a risk and a cost that they are no longer willing to bear,” says Hartshorn. Some companies are freezing their defined plans voluntarily, meaning they stop making contributions and employees stop earning benefits. (Under the PPA, a plan is automatically frozen if it is less than 60% funded.) Phone maker Motorola, newspaper publisher McClatchy, aerospace company GenCorp, insurer Aon and apparel retailer Talbots are among the nearly 100 companies that have frozen pension plans in the last few months, according to the Pension Rights Center. Freezing a plan can save money on contributions but does not remove the long-term risk and volatility for the employer, notes Hartshorn. Companies will still have to pay out on promises that have already been made and benefits that employees have already earned. Drastic Solutions That fact has some companies contemplating even more drastic solutions. “Many corporations are thinking about whether they should file for bankruptcy in order to unload their retiree promises,” says Mitchell. If a company goes bankrupt, the plan would be taken over by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC), a federal agency that insures private-sector pensions. Created under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, the PBCG guarantees payment of basic pension benefits for 44 million American workers and retirees in more than 29,000 private-sector defined benefit plans. The PBGC paid out $4.29 billion in benefits to more than 640,000 people in 2008, and collected $1.49 billion in insurance premiums from pension plan sponsors, which are its main source of funding. But there is a limit to how much the PBGC will pay in benefits. The maximum guaranteed pension for participants in plans that terminated in 2008 was $51,750 per year at age 65, and lower for couples or early retirees. Workers who were promised more than that would be out of luck if their company declared bankruptcy. “It’s important to understand what is actually guaranteed,” Mitchell says. In addition to taking over pensions from distressed companies, the PBGC also takes over fully funded plans that employers voluntarily terminate. (Companies cannot choose to terminate a plan unless it is fully funded.) The problem, Mitchell points out, is that the PBGC itself is $11.15 billion in the hole. PBGC’s annual report for 2008 notes: “The Corporation has sufficient liquidity to meet its obligations for a number of years; however, neither of its insurance programs at present has the resources to fully satisfy PBGC’s long-term obligation to plan participants.” Says Mitchell: “There is a big concern about that insurance guarantor. And if any one of the big auto companies goes bust, that could double or triple the PBGC’s under-funded status.” PBGC spokesman Gary Pastorius says the PBGC has run a deficit for most of its history — in fact, its deficit shrunk in 2008 — and has a healthy enough cash flow to keep things going. “On a cash flow basis, we’re pretty strong,” Pastorius says. “The assets are on hand now. The liabilities, we pay out into the future. Not everybody’s ready to retire yet.” At least the PBGC doesn’t have to worry about funding pensions for public employees. “There is not a PBGC for state and local government pension plans,” says Keith Brainard, research director at the National Association of State Retirement Administrators (NASRA), which represents 82 statewide public retirement systems for about 22 million working and retired employees of state and local governments. “By and large, the taxpayers are the backstop.” Like 401(k) accounts and private-sector pensions, public pension funds have watched assets fall during the financial crisis. According to the most recent figures from the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College, aggregate assets for state and local pensions have dropped $1.3 trillion since the peak of the market on October 9, 2007. NASRA estimates that its members are now about 85% funded, on average. Cities and towns throughout the U.S. are juggling tightening budgets with pension shortfalls, straining to find a way to make ends meet without raising taxes and causing more economic strife. “So the question is, what happens if they go broke?” asks Mitchell. “And it’s really unclear.” In response to a budget crisis, the City of Philadelphia recently announced it would suspend contributions to the city employees’ pension fund and extend amortization of the shortfall from 20 to 40 years, Mitchell notes. “They can’t fill the potholes and police the crime. So what it means is that we’re consuming the services today, but we’re going to make our grandchildren pay for them.” The other looming question, says Mitchell, is: What would happen if a state pension got into big trouble? Most states’ employee pension plans are guaranteed by a combination of the state constitution and state law. That could make it difficult for states to scale back on pension contributions, because the only way to cut the pension would be to amend the constitution, Mitchell notes. Brainard calls the doomsday scenarios for state and local pensions “a distant and unlikely event…. States and cities don’t typically declare bankruptcy, they’re not acquired and they don’t go out of business. Most public pension plans have assets to continue meeting their liabilities indefinitely or for decades.” Besides, the true impact of the current financial crisis will not show up for most public pensions for at least another year, because there is a lag in reporting, Brainard adds. Since the fiscal year for most state and local governments ends in June rather than December, most of the worst market losses haven’t even been recorded. Also, as public pensions do not fall under the PPA, most are able to smooth gains and losses over a much longer period than their private-sector counterparts — from three to 15 years. So if the economy rebounds soon, the astounding losses of 2008 could largely fade away. And if the economy continues to sputter, the worst shortfalls for public pensions may be yet to come. “It is really going to take a few years to understand and recognize what effect the market decline has had,” Brainard says. A New System? In the meantime, retirement experts are looking at the crisis as an opportunity to point out flaws in the system and suggest change. Indeed, the crisis has highlighted problems with all of America’s current retirement plans, they say. Defined contribution plans place too much burden on the individual; private sector defined benefit plans place too much burden on the employer; and public sector pensions shift the burden to entire communities of taxpayers and threaten to drag down local economies. “To me, the health of our retirement system [depends on taking] lessons from the financial crisis and applying them correctly, making sure pension law supports the next innovation,” says Watson Wyatt’s Glickstein. “The bloom is off the rose to a large degree on the 401(k), and I think there’s going to be a renewed interest in coming up with a new retirement plan design.” Glickstein sees room for a hybrid called a cash balance plan, which attempts to incorporate the features of a 401(k) into a defined benefit plan. Others have called for automatic enrollment in the target-date 401(k)s that automatically reallocate investments as an investor nears retirement. The Pension Rights Center has launched what it calls the Retirement USA Initiative, which is pushing for systematic change. “Even before the current recession, retirement income security had become a major national concern, as companies increasingly shifted away from traditional pensions to do-it-yourself savings plans,” the group’s web site says. “In the past six months, the faltering stock market and dwindling 401(k) accounts have turned a major concern into a crisis…. It is critical to start now to lay the foundation for a new system to supplement Social Security for future retirees — one that is universal, secure and adequate.” Munnell, of the Center for Retirement Research, has stepped up her calls for a new mandatory, universal savings account that would replace about 20% of pre-retirement income. “Placing all the financial risk for the second tier of retirement income on either individuals or on firms does not work,” she wrote in a paper published last November. “The private sector is unlikely to revert back to defined benefit plans, where employers bear all the risk. But relying on a system where the individual bears all the risk does not make much sense either. It may be time for the United States to consider other ways of designing a retirement system.” One of the long-term lessons from the financial crisis is the importance of risk management, says Mitchell. “One thing that many baby boomers are probably aware of is that it is going to take much more money to retire.” As they see their 401(k) account balances plummet, “people now understand risk in a real, visceral way, more than they ever did before.” In addition, she says, it no longer wise to rely entirely on employers to provide retirement security. “It’s really hard to link retirement benefits to an employer who may or may not be there. And that has been brought to the fore by the discussion of the auto companies’ potential bankruptcy. As a young worker, you often don’t think that this is a promise that may be 100 years long. So it is a real challenge to try to construct both a financial system that can keep long-term promises and a political system to back those promises.” Going forward, Mitchell sees reforming Social Security as one of the most important issues in retirement planning because it is the base on which the rest of America’s retirement system is built. “I think the biggest problem is the near insolvency of Social Security,” says Mitchell. “The fact that it is running out of money in six or seven years is already putting implicit pressure on retirement plans and everything else. So that’s priority one in my book.”

Can Truckers see boost from pandemic aid’s pension lifeline?

Unionized trucking companies could get a lift from a provision of the $1.9 trillion coronavirus aid package that throws a fiscal lifeline to struggling multiemployer pension plans. Analysts say the measure President Biden signed into law this month should help clear a cloud that investors see hanging over truckers ArcBest Corp. and Yellow Corp. The unionized carriers are the top two active employers in the largest of the plans likely eligible for relief, the Teamsters’ Central States Pension Fund, which is projected to become insolvent in 2025. “There was always the lingering risk that if there was severe risk of underfunding you’d have to pay extra into the Central States,” said Citigroup Inc. transportation analyst Christian Wetherbee. The support also could benefit delivery giant United Parcel Service Inc., which withdrew from the fund in 2007 but as of the end of last year potentially retained some liability if Central States became insolvent, according to securities filings. Companies including Anheuser-Busch InBev SA, Conagra Brands Inc. and Marathon Oil Corp. also contribute to the plan, whose participants also include truck drivers, package delivery drivers and warehouse workers. Central States was 19.5% funded as of Jan. 1, 2020, the most recent period for which figures are available, with $11.44 billion in assets and $58.51 billion in liabilities. Multiemployer pension plans are maintained under agreements between unions and multiple companies in particular sectors. Their financial stability has wavered in recent years due to changes in demographics, shifting business trends and a decline in the numbers of workers who are union members, leaving many plans underfunded. The federal Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation backstops benefit payments for about 10 million participants in those plans, but the fund supporting the assistance is projected to run dry in 2027, according to the Congressional Budget Office. In trucking, the multiemployer pension risks are largely concentrated in the less-than-truckload sector, where carriers combine shipments from multiple customers on a single truck. Yellow, previously known as YRC Worldwide Inc., and ArcBest’s ABF Freight segment are among the largest carriers in the sector, employing thousands of unionized workers and competing against rivals unencumbered by the higher pension and benefits costs that unionized operators typically carry. Under the legislation, PBGC would provide an estimated $86 billion in grants to qualifying multiemployer plans to cover benefits through 2051. More than 50 Teamsters pension plans are now eligible for that assistance, according to the union. The provision in the Covid-19 relief plan essentially removes much of the risk carriers may have faced if Central States or other multiemployer plans collapsed. Analysts said such failures otherwise may have left companies facing liabilities, such as increased contributions to the funds. Mr. Wetherbee wrote in a March 10 research note that for ArcBest the federal backing “will effectively eliminate a valuation overhang that has for years contributed to its sizable valuation discount vs. higher quality peers such as Old Dominion and Saia…As a result we would expect to see the company’s valuation spread to premium LTL carriers narrow substantially.” An ArcBest spokesman said the aid is “encouraging news” for Teamster-represented drivers, dockworkers and retirees in the company’s ABF Freight business. “While we cannot determine the contribution rates that will be required under future collective bargaining agreements,” he said, “we believe future contribution rates to these plans will be less likely to increase as a result of the passage of this act.” The pension-relief provision also may help ArcBest and Yellow compete for drivers and dockworkers because it provides greater certainty of retirement benefits for unionized workers. “This relief will secure the hard earned retirements of many front line American workers including members of the Yellow team and hundreds of thousands of retirees in other industries,” Yellow spokeswoman Heather Nauert said. For UPS, the bill could reduce or eliminate the company’s potential liability associated with its 2007 agreement to withdraw from the Central States fund, said Jack Atkins, a transportation analyst at investment bank Stephens Inc.

HOME