Variants List
Select Variant
Select Variant
Specs Comparison
BodyType Pickup Pickup
Segment 4x4 4x4
Transmission AT MT
Capacity(L) 2.0 2.5
Horsepower(PS) 213 110
Torque (Nm) 500 200
0-100 km/h (s) - -
Dimensions Comparison
Dimensions Comparison
5426 mm
3220 mm
1860 mm
1848 mm
5220 mm
3000 mm
1815 mm
1655 mm
Photo Comparison
Exterior
Interior
Comparison of Pons & Cons
Pros
  • Android Auto and Apple CarPlay support
  • There's a Ford Ranger for everyone, including a mental Ranger Raptor
  • Powerful 2.0L biturbo engine
Read More
  • Most comfortable pick-up truck in the segment 
  • Generous safety equipment, top spec gets ADAS features
  • Support for Android Auto and Apple CarPlay
Read More
Cons
  • Lack of a 360-degree camera makes parking a challenge
  • Not as many service centres as Japanese counterpart
  • Ranger Raptor doesn't get ADAS features
Read More
  • Acceleration does not feel as strong as the predecessor model
  • Gear ratios poorly matched
  • Average fuel consumption
Read More
Car Reviews Comparison
Car Reviews
Owner review: A Class of it's own, My story of 2018 Subaru forester 2.0 NA
Owner Review: Comfortable handling and good fuel economy - My Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT AUTO
Owner Review: 3 Years of Ownership, Owning and Upgrading My Ford Ranger
Review: 2021 Mitsubishi Triton Athlete is the best Hilux that you want to ride in
Truck wars: Mitsubishi Triton vs Toyota Hilux vs Isuzu D-Max
Review: Mitsubishi Triton VGT Adventure X – Great to drive, but smaller than the Hilux
Video Comparison
Video

2021 Ford Ranger WildTrak Sport 2.0 Bi-Turbo in Malaysia, Check out What's New!

2020 Mitsubishi Triton vs Toyota Hilux vs Isuzu D-Max Comparison Review, Which is The Best?

User Review Comparison
Overall Rating
4.4/5
Excellent
4/5
Excellent
Rating Parameters
4.8
Performance
4.2
Performance
4
Ride Comfort
4.8
Ride Comfort
4.5
Space
4
Space
4.1
Fuel Economy
3.2
Fuel Economy
4.7
Quality & Features
4.1
Quality & Features
4.1
Price & Cost
4
Price & Cost
  • Which is more reliable Ford Ranger or Mitsubishi Triton?

    Both Ford Ranger and Mitsubishi Triton have a reliability rating of 4.0 (out of 5.0 points).
  • Which is more fuel efficient Ford Ranger or Mitsubishi Triton?

    The specific fuel consumption comparison of the vehicles can be found here: ,
  • Which car has more legroom Ford Ranger or Mitsubishi Triton?

    To compare the legrooms of the cars, you can see the spec comparison data above.

In brief reviews

Trying to figure out which car you should buy? Ford Ranger or Mitsubishi Triton? Compare the models on the basis of their Car Price, Size, Space, Boot Space, Service cost, Mileage, Features, Colours, and other specs.

Ford Ranger

Ford Ranger price starts at RM 108888.Ford Ranger has 2.0L engine.

Mitsubishi Triton

Mitsubishi Triton price starts at RM 81390.Mitsubishi Triton has 2.5L engine.

It can be a headache making decisions between multiple cars without the right Wapcar comparison tool, this is why experts at Wapcar are here to help you out. Select the cars you’re interested in from the list of our cars, and we got you covered for the rest.


Comparing multiple vehicles, variants and features can't be easier with WapCar’s strong car comparison tool, just stack them all up from the cars list. Compare variants, features, warranties, fuel economy, prices, and passenger room, you’ll surely have an idea of what your perfect car is with our clear and informative comparison report between Ford Ranger vs Mitsubishi Triton. Check out the pros and cons and the latest news on the cars, and compare not just the exterior gallery but what the interiors look like in detail. Wapcar’s handful while a strong car comparison system is becoming a must-have tool for beginners, and even experts in the automotive industry. You can one-click compare competitive vehicles, car models, or No. of seats of different cars. The WapCar’s comparison tool isn't just about comparing cars and their specs and features, it is about helping you to find the perfect fit car. We have your back here to make sure you are getting the right car.