The all-new Ford Ranger continues its segment high in the third quarter of 2019 with an increase of 12%
The sole distributor of Ford in Malaysia-Sime Darby Auto Connexion, introduced the Ford Ranger Wildtrak
Sime Darby Auto Connexion (SDAC), the official distributor of Ford vehicles in Malaysia has just introduced
Sime Darby Auto ConneXion (SDAC) is offering attractive savings on selected Ford Ranger Raptor and Ford
The Ford Ranger Wildtrak received a mild nip-and-tuck in August 2020, in which the pick-up truck received
When Ford Performance unleashed the Ford Ranger Raptor, many were disappointed that the pick-up truck
Ford has just globally debuted the new 2021 Ford Ranger facelift alongside the Everest facelift in Thailand
Sime Darby Auto ConneXion (SDAC), the sole distributor of Ford vehicles in Malaysia, introduced a new
Sime Darby Auto ConneXion (SDAC), Malaysias sole distributor of Ford vehicles, has revised the pricelist
Sime Darby Auto ConneXion (SDAC) has added a new variant to its Ford Ranger range – the special
Just over a month ago Sime Darby Auto ConneXion (SDAC) took the covers off the special edition 2021 Ford
Details of the next-generation 2022 Ford Ranger have surfaced, courtesy of Australian publication CarExpert.According
Yesterday, Ford debuted the 2021 Ford Ranger Wildtrak facelift in Thailand and it looks, well the same
Ford Thailand has just launched the 2021 Ford Ranger FX4 Max, and you might call it a budget Ranger Raptor
Sime Darby Auto ConneXion (SDAC) is offering up some awesome ang pao money when you purchase a Ford Ranger
Source: CarExpertThe next-generation, all-new Ford Ranger is set to make its debut in 2022, said the
Ford Ranger gallerySime Darby Auto Connexion (SDAC), the official distributor of Ford vehicles in Malaysia
Last week, we reported that Ford is working together with Volkswagen to develop the next-generation Ranger
Making its world debut in Thailand last November, the 2021 Ford Ranger now sports a refreshed look and
(Model | Gallery) The thinking mans Ford Ranger Raptor Same powertrain as the Ford Ranger Raptor, 213
2022 Ford Ranger Wildtrak High Rider 2.0
27,255 km
2 years
Kuantan
Roush Launches Ford Ranger Cat-Back Exhaust System https://t.co/4TanIThRvq https://t.co/dBJpbLa8U9
Wake Up The New Ford Ranger With This MagnaFlow Exhaust: Video https://t.co/SK7qGfmZNi https://t.co/7IxiJuN7jN
Exhaust Manifold Left Dorman 674-361 fits 91-95 Ford Ranger 3.0L-V6 https://t.co/lRT8pgIir1 eBay https://t.co/k96JvCI8Eo
📷 TAEVision #Engineering ’s Posts on @tumblr #tumblr - Tue, May 21 #3D #Mechanical #Design #Parts TURBOSMART #wastegate #Porsche #Exhaust #Automotive #Agriculture #MercedesBenz #GClass #OffRoad / #EClass #E400 #Renault #Twizy #Ford #Ranger #PickUp #Trucks https://t.co/X6aQlwYnVy https://t.co/bZWlSt1Vz5
Ford Ranger Exhaust Repair https://t.co/wcZTm31mqD https://t.co/3Oqaw7NldT
2023 Ford Ranger Raptor spied testing for the very first time with a more rugged front fascia, squared-off rock rails, dual exhaust tips, as well as a set of BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A K02 tires. Additionally, the pickup truck could be powered by a 2.7-liter twin-turbo V6 engine. https://t.co/l0GsZolocG
Hks exhaust for ford ranger / Wildtrak https://t.co/Hw1xRKASoH
AFE Rebel Series 3in Cat-Back Exhaust Side W/ Black Tips for Ford Ranger 19 2.3L https://t.co/foJbx4q0Y3 eBay https://t.co/msQhQHqKFG
Idk about you, but there is nothing... ABSOLUTELY NOTHING more bad ass to me, than a Ford Ranger with Exhaust Stacks on it.... #OnlyInElPaso Also, they aren’t connected. The real exhaust is clearly visible 😂 https://t.co/uZo6326c4I
Hennessey has upgraded the Ford Ranger Raptor to create the aptly named Hennessey VelociRaptor Ranger. The improvements include a stainless steel cat-back exhaust and ECU tuning, providing the VelociRaptor with 360bhp, 440lb of talk and 0-60mph in 4.9 seconds. https://t.co/bySK9lzJch
What can I use to replace a heat shield on my exhaust of my 1992 Ford Ranger XLT 2.3, I'm dying inside the cabin it's so hot? If your exhaust is ,that, hot, a heat shield isn’t going to help much..
You can't. No exhaust will EVER make a Ford Ranger sound built. They are complete slugs. I even had a v6, and it was a slow POS.
Probably not any more CO2 than usual, but since you can’t smell it, anyway, you couldn’t detect it with your nose. An engine that old probably does have a significantly high level of carbon MONOXIDE though! This is odorless and very deadly, so even though you can’t smell it, smelling the exhaust can kill you. I would suggest that if it has a lot of odor, your carburetor needs looking at because the fuel/air mixture is probably too rich. Take it to a shop and have the exhaust gasses checked.
I am very qualified to answer this question. This my Ford Ranger. It has Level III-A armoring. I am allowed to drive it anywhere as long as it is legally registered and insured. Like other people have said, you can armor your windows but that makes it superfluous. You want your whole passenger compartment armored. Most armorers won’t do just the windows. The suspension, steering, hydraulic, and brake systems have to be updated to handle the added weight. They rip the whole car apart and add reinforcement throughout the entire vehicle. Depending on vehicle size and level of armoring it can take a while to build. This is Lexan glass that has been shot by different caliber rounds. As you can see, it’s layered. Here is the other side. It absorbs and distributes the energy of the bullet. It’s designed to allow you to GET AWAY. Eventually, it will fail as nothing lasts forever when it comes to armored vehicles. Both SUV’s were chosen based on their engine size and ease of armoring. You can only go up to a certain level of armoring with each vehicle due to weight restrictions/constraints. The engine had to be strong enough to handle the added weight. The Ford Ranger is III-A and the Ranger Rover is B6. Depending on where I’m going I’ll take one over the other, but they are completely armored; not just the windows. Please note you can buy the car fully armored or buy the car and then have it armored. In either case, it’s going to be expensive. The higher the armor level the more expensive. Going to B6-B7 expect to pay $250K-$300K. Also, you void your original manufacturer's warranty once you do it. Maintenance, gas, and insurance are other considerations. Also, you’ll have to replace the windows every 5–6 years due to wear from UV exposure. Good luck. I’m adding a few additional photos as an addendum to my orignal post above: As you can see the window can go down only partially. It’s close to 2 inches thick due to multiple layers. The front windows go down partially and the rear windows are disabled. This saves weight for motors as the front window motors are heavy duty due to the increased weight. If you tap the window you’ll hear a dull sound which indicates thickness. Tap hard enough, it hurts- Lesson learned. Here are two vehicles which are in the process of being put back together. They added armor to the frame on the passenger compartment. The engine housing has been reinforced as well so you can GET AWAY which is all armored vehicles are designed to do. Take a hit and keep on going so you can escape. The suspension system, brakes, rotors, tires (run-flat/bullet resistant), and exhaust systems are modified for increased weight. Also, the heating and AC have been upgraded since you can’t crack a window. The gas tank, sometimes, is made larger due to increased fuel consumption. Also, the electrical system is upgraded to handle the increased loads. The Lexan windows have been shot out for testing and demonstration purposes. They are marked with what caliber made the impact. All Lexan glass is designed to ABSORB and distribute the energy of the bullet. The thicker the glass the higher the caliber it can resist. Again given enough rounds it will fail. Also, if they are hitting you with higher caliber weaponry than the window is designed to take, then you’re well and truly f*ed. They’ll have cameras mounted on the exterior so you can look on your radio screen where you’re going. Of course, you have to specify and pay for it to be included. Everything is custom but that’s all discussed prior to the armoring taking place. The interior of the window is shown and the whole door, as well. You can see the welding done on the inside of the door. They added additional steel, so this shows that you really want your whole passenger compartment armored. Just getting bullet-resistant windows may not cut it. It’s not as bad as it seems, and relatively straight forward… Don’t put yourself in a position to get shot. As always, on Quora, be sure to speak to a professional in their respective field which you have a concern. They can help you with anything you need - be it a doctor, lawyer, accountant, financial analyst, or in this case armorer. That’s just common sense. Please look in the comments section for further information. I am adding a armor leveling chart for reference.
What’s an American car? One built in America? Or an American brand (Ford are consistently amongst the biggest brands in sales over here)? Or what? Really, it sort of comes down to stereotypes. When someone says “an American car” people think of either: A large pickup truck (bigger than say, a Nissan Navara) A huge land yacht of some sort. Think a 1960s Cadillac or similar a muscle car, typically a mustang a Chrysler PT Cruiser And the reactions to these sorts of “American cars” varies by type. Large pickup trucks just aren’t practical. They’re too big (a Ford Ranger is pretty big over here) for our roads and parking spaces, and it rains all the time so vans are more practical for most commercial applications. Huge land yachts aren’t practical either - you sacrifice a lot of storage space for the saloon/sedan style. And they’re about 9 miles long! But there’s nostalgia for old cars, I guess. Mustangs are actually pretty popular over here since Ford started making it easy to get them in the mid 2010s. It’s a statement car and petrol heads tend to like them. And frankly, they’re not terrible value for money vs other large cars in Ford’s stable. Finally, ownership of a PT Cruiser tends to indicate some kind of horrible eye injury. Here endeth an ,exhaustive, treatment of American cars in the British market!
Great answers here already. Here is my experience on when to trust your mechanic. I have been a pretty good shade tree mechanic when younger in the ‘60’s & ‘70’s. Became a fair diagnostician with the help of an aircraft engine mechanic friend of the family who loved working on old cars. So later in life when I am not so up to date with the automotive computers and can better afford to have my work done, I use a reputable shop that doesn’t diagnose by “parts replacement “. I trusted them before this particular incident and had been using them for about 3 or 4 years when my Ford Ranger six cylinder engine started running very rough, more than just a cylinder or two. I thought I needed a valve job and told them so when I dropped it off for my mechanic shop to work on. They called me back after looking at it and advised me that I just needed a pre-formed hose from the engine to the throttle body: it was designed a little too close to the exhaust and commonly would get a leak, a vacuum leak. Cost about $110.00 from the dealer (pre-formed, with a couple of angles and not the same size at both ends). They saved me a LOT of $$$ money$$$!, and re-confirmed a customer for life. Find a good honest mechanic and hold onto them.
Depends on the car, really. However, here are some horrible examples: the heater core in a Volvo 240/740. Volvo guys joke that when they built those cars, they start by putting the heater core on the conveyor belt and then building the rest of the damned car around it. the heater core in MANY vehicles, actually. I can do a 97–01 Jeep Cherokee one in 3–4 hours, but that’s because I’ve got plenty of practice. Most vehicles aside from 80s and earlier domestics, etc have it really buried in the dashboard. A great counterexample is the 91–96 GM B-body sedan/wagon, I can do a heater core or evap core on those in under 30 minutes, not including refrigerant or coolant refill. the rear main seal on an 4.0L powered Jeep is somewhat miserable, but not the worst if you know a couple tricks. pilot bearing, clutch, throwout bearing, all on a manual. Why? Well, they’re located between the engine and transmission, so you are removing one or the other to get at them. Under $100 in parts, hours and hours of labor. similarly, the flexplate or torque converter seal on an automatic. the timing chains (there are 4 of them) on a 4.2L V8 Audi S4 are particularly miserable. Why? Well, they’re on the back of the engine, so you’re spending ten hours to pull the engine, then you have to do 4 timing chains and a bunch of complicated tensioners and guides and put it back in. the alternator bracket oil gasket on a BMW. Yes, that’s a real thing. They put a hole in the side of the engine block because the oil cooler on some models attaches to those ports, but on the particular model I’m talking about, it’s just a bracket that connects the holes together with a 5 dollar gasket that takes a zillion hours to get at and replace. You have to jack the engine up. Don’t buy an E65 chassis BMW X5 unless you’re prepared for some serious pain, folks. the front timing cover on a Ford 6.0L PowerStroke. Why? Well, you have to remove the oil pan, and to do that, I seem to recall you have to remove the transmission, which also means of course removing the transfer case (if 4x4) and the driveshaft(s). Don’t break any bosses off the timing cover or you basically have to gut the drivetrain to replace it… the entire HPOP system, EGR cooler, standpipes, etc on the same 6.0L Ford. Very common issues… and it’s such a pain in the arse to get at that most mechanics literally remove the cab from the truck because IT’S FASTER THAT WAY. Yes, taking half the body off makes engine repairs faster on this truck. Thinking about buying an Expedition or Econoline with this engine in it? I hope you are looking forward to removing literally the entire body from the frame to do engine repairs you can reasonably assume will eventually have to be done, because they all need it eventually. spark plugs and exhaust manifolds on 4.6, 5.4, and 6.8 liter Ford “mod motors”. Some years, the spark plugs break in half when you try to remove them, other years, the replacement plugs strip the holes and fly out when you drive it, denting the hood. timing chains on a 4.0L SOHC V6 Ford. There are 3 or 4 depending on whether it’s got a balance shaft or not. One of them IS ON THE BACK OF THE ENGINE. Why? So Ford could save five bucks by using the same cylinder head casting on both sides of the engine instead of mirror images. What it means? WHEN the timing chain cassette guides fail, you are pulling the engine to replace one of them. fuel tank replacement on a rustbelt Subaru. Why? Well you see, here’s how you do it. First you put the car on the lift. Then you remove both rear wheels, the rear wheel knuckles/bearing housings, the struts (simply because they’re easier to unbolt from the body than it is to unbolt the knuckles from the struts), the rear suspension crossmember and differential, the differential snout T-bar, the rear driveshaft, exhaust… now you can get to the fuel tank. Replace the rear brake pipes and every steel pipe and fitting in the evaporative emissions system while it’s out because they’re all swiss cheese, then put the whole mess back together… and get an alignment done because the whole rear suspension is out of whack now. Oh, they’re steel tanks and rot out in 10–15 years so you have to do this if you live in a state with emissions testing on older cars. Oh and half the bolts I mentioned? They’re either seized solid or screwed into swiss cheese rusty body panels AND seized solid so I hope you’re good with a welder. rear unibody repairs to the subframe that a first-generation Toyota Rav4 rear suspension crossmember mounts to. Especially fun when you don’t want to unbolt any of the parts because you know the whole thing will fall apart if you do, so it’s time to weld the repair panels on without removing the parts that are in your way. The starter motor on a rear wheel drive V8 Toyota pickup or sedan. It’s a fairly cheap part, but guess where it is? Buried in the valley between the two cylinder heads, under the intake manifold and all the parts attached to the top of the engine! The Cadillac Northstar V8 has it in the same place, though it’s a bit easier to replace. rear wheel bearings on the era of Subaru that uses what’s affectionately known as the BAB (“big ass bolt”): If you see this bolt and your rear wheel bearings are rumbling or whining… I hope you’re a decent home mechanic with a 12 ton hydraulic press because otherwise you should pay a pro or sell the car. ANY repair in the engine bay of a W8 engine Passat. Really cool engine? Yes. Really impossible and/or prohibitively expensive to get any parts for it including ones that fail often? Oh yes. Don’t buy these unless you really enjoy the smell of money burning, the glow of check engine lights, and the particularly invigorating feeling of wondering what’s going to break and leave you debating whether to let it sit or spend hundreds on what should be a $5 part. The THERMOSTAT (normally a $2 to $15 part) is $260 to $682. And if it fails you will fail emissions because… the CEL will come on. Why? Because rather than make a solenoid or motor actuated valve and use it to regulate coolant flow… they took a regular thermostat and attached an actuator to it so the computer can move it too. WHEN the actuator fails, the computer notices and on goes the light! UPDATE: holy moly, I didn't expect this answer to be this popular! I think it might be the most-read thing I've ever written and it's only been a day. One of the commenters reminded me of another Awful Repair… clutch hydraulics on a 94-ish Ford ranger. Never again will I work on that mess. Literally everything about it is poorly designed and/or designed with malice and ill intent for every poor bastard of a mechanic who may have to work on it. First of all, it’s what’s known as an “internal slave” type clutch actuator - the slave cylinder is a donut shaped piston concentrically located on the input shaft rather than using a throwout bearing on a clutch fork and a slave cylinder mounted externally to the bellhousing. So if the seals in the slave cylinder go, you have to drop the trans to get at it. The master cylinder is buried under the brake booster, and fed remotely from a little reservoir on the firewall. Normally that’s nice but they mounted it with the ass end uphill and it’s fed from the bottom so it’s proper miserable to bleed - you basically have to bleed it out of the truck, but then you can’t get the freaking thing in without losing all your fluid! Further, they used a particularly hellishly inspired plastic clip to hold the master cylinder pushrod to the pedal - and then buried it as far up into the dashboard as possible… facing the A-pillar… with sheetmetal brackets and junk in the way. And if you lose your temper after screwing with it for 20 minutes trying to unclip it you have to buy a whole new master cylinder because that 5 cent plastic clip is not available ANYWHERE separately (at least for 94-down, I see one for 95-up.) It is presently held on with 3 zipties on my brother’s truck because neither of us felt overly compelled to negotiate with terrorists or pay their blood money. Oh, and the hydraulic line is held into the slave cylinder end with a really miserably designed little quick connect fitting… not the standard one used on trans cooler lines and fuel lines that’s annoying enough, they came up with a whole new miserable design that’s several circles of Hell lower: It seems specifically designed to be impossible to release after 1 day of dirt and salt - the little plastic collar that’s supposed to release those stainless steel barbs gets packed with road dust and the brass corrodes a bit, cementing it in place, and when you try and use the special tool Lisle designed it just mangles the plastic collar and little brass ridge you’re supposed to pry against, and you can only get about 270 degrees of the collar forced down because the bellhousing is in the way of the other 90 degrees! Great design, Ford. Ended up replacing the line along with the slave cylinder. Then the aforementioned bleeding adventure began. It took hours to actually get it right, and reading Ford forums afterward this is not unusual. Protip: just remove the driver side inner fender liner, at least you have room to work inside the wheel well and can bleed the master with it held in a better orientation, hook the line to it, bleed it all, and slap it into the firewall before anything goes wrong. It’s still hell, but at least it’s possible. Suffice to say if I was cursed with such a vehicle repair again I would pay someone else to do it, and I literally do all my own repairs from basic maintenance up to and including AC work, differential R&P setup, trans rebuilds, and electrical fault diagnosis. It would be the first time one of my cars has ever been in a shop for work aside from glass replacement, which I've done but it's actually more economical to have it done than it is to buy the materials myself these days. Those clutch hydraulics are truly an evil, monstrous work by an evil person. These repairs are my least favorite, but I’m sure there are some I’m forgetting and I’m sure there are worse examples.
Americans are holding onto their cars longer as reliability and durability have increased. Data show that the average age of cars on U.S. roads is 11.5 years. At the average annual miles driven of about 14,000 miles, cars are racking up an average total of 161,000 miles over the life of the car. One would conclude that the average ICE doesn’t “live” to see 250,000 miles. Some do, of course, if well cared for, but most people are hard on their cars and typically trade them after 6 years. I’m one of those who drives her car for 200,000 miles or more. Cars are expensive and the buying process is stressful. I’ve learned over the years to buy reliable, safe, low maintenance cars. I’ve never regretted paying a higher price for a new car that scored high marks for quality. Still, the most miles I’ve ever put on a car or truck was 231,000 miles (1993 Ford Ranger). It was well cared for, but just wore itself out. Amazingly, the truck’s body looked great — almost no rust. The steering and suspension held up well, too. It was the engine, clutch, transmission, transfer case, and exhaust system that soaked up the bulk of my maintenance dollars. There’s no way I could reached 250,000 miles without spending some serious money. I got $900 for it at auction based on its overall excellent appearance. I’m replacing my 2001 Subaru Forester (200,000+ miles) this year with a Tesla Model 3 costing twice what I paid for the Subaru. There’s no telling how long I’ll keep the car, but I have reason to believe that reaching 250,000 miles is not only possible, but likely. My estimated cost of operation, maintenance, and repairs, if accurate, will more than make up for the initial premium price of the Model 3 even if battery replacement is necessary at some point. I found this 2 part Youtube video by Ingineerix showing the mechanical and electrical components of Tesla’s Model 3 interesting. The relative simplicity and accessibility to these subsystems compared to a typical ICE vehicle is remarkable, and should contribute to significantly lower maintenance and repair cost.
Here are the Model and variants of Ford Ranger:
Variants | 2020 Ford Ranger FX4 | 2020 Ford Ranger Raptor 2.0 Bi-Turbo | 2019 Ford Ranger 2.0L XLT Limited Edition | 2019 Ford Ranger Raptor 2.0L 4X4 High Rdier | 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 XL Single Cab (M) | 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 XL (M) | 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 XL (A) | 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT (M) | 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT (A) | 2018 Ford Ranger 2.0 Si-Turbo XLT+ (A) | 2018 Ford Ranger 2.0 WildTrak 4x2 (A) | 2018 Ford Ranger 2.0 Bi-Turbo WildTrak 4x4 (A) | 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 XL Standard 4x4 (M) | 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 XL 4x4 High Rider Single Cab MT | 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 XL 4x4 (M) | 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT 4x4 (M) | 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT 4x4 (A) | 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 FX4 4x4 (A) | 2018 Ford Ranger 3.2 XLT 4x4 (M) | 2018 Ford Ranger 3.2 XLT 4x4 (A) | 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 WildTrak 4x4 (A) | 2018 Ford Ranger 3.2 WildTrak 4x4 (A) | 2018 Ford Ranger Raptor 2.0 Bi-Turbo | 2020 Ford Ranger 2.0 Bi-Turbo WildTrak 4x4 (A) |
Model | Ford Ranger | Ford Ranger | Ford Ranger | Ford Ranger | Ford Ranger | Ford Ranger | Ford Ranger | Ford Ranger | Ford Ranger | Ford Ranger | Ford Ranger | Ford Ranger | Ford Ranger | Ford Ranger | Ford Ranger | Ford Ranger | Ford Ranger | Ford Ranger | Ford Ranger | Ford Ranger | Ford Ranger | Ford Ranger | Ford Ranger | Ford Ranger |
Here are the Cylinder Arrangement and variants of Ford Ranger:
Variants | 2020 Ford Ranger Raptor 2.0 Bi-Turbo | 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 XL Single Cab (M) | 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 XL (M) | 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 XL (A) | 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT (M) | 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT (A) | 2018 Ford Ranger 2.0 Si-Turbo XLT+ (A) | 2018 Ford Ranger 2.0 WildTrak 4x2 (A) | 2018 Ford Ranger 2.0 Bi-Turbo WildTrak 4x4 (A) | 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 XL Standard 4x4 (M) | 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 XL 4x4 High Rider Single Cab MT | 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 XL 4x4 (M) | 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT 4x4 (M) | 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 XLT 4x4 (A) | 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 FX4 4x4 (A) | 2018 Ford Ranger 3.2 XLT 4x4 (M) | 2018 Ford Ranger 3.2 XLT 4x4 (A) | 2018 Ford Ranger 2.2 WildTrak 4x4 (A) | 2018 Ford Ranger 3.2 WildTrak 4x4 (A) | 2018 Ford Ranger Raptor 2.0 Bi-Turbo | 2020 Ford Ranger 2.0 Bi-Turbo WildTrak 4x4 (A) |
Cylinder Arrangement | Inline | Inline | Inline | Inline | Inline | Inline | Inline | Inline | Inline | Inline | Inline | Inline | Inline | Inline | Inline | Inline | Inline | Inline | Inline | Inline | Inline |
Yes, Ford Ranger is available in Screen Size(inch). The available Screen Size(inch) variants are: 2020 Ford Ranger Raptor 2.0 Bi-Turbo, 2019 Ford Ranger 2.0L XLT Limited Edition, 2020 Ford Ranger 2.0 Bi-Turbo WildTrak 4x4 (A).